2 TD drives for Moore in 1 game. Only 1 TD drive for Tannehill in 2 games.

Dammit, I looked at it. And I KNOW better.

Are you just pointing out that Moore has more Fantasy points thus far than Tanny in the pre-season, playing against inferior competition, while playing more snaps?

Or, are you trying to tell us that, in your opinion, Moore should be named the starter over T-hill at this point? Please clarify.
If so, this will be the last post of your I read or take seriously.

dolphin is a fake guys. He was caught posting as dolfin1.

He is a spammer and we shouldn't take him serious.

If we just say we agree with you, will you finally shut up about it?

Moore should clearly be starter over Tannehill.

Will never happen of course, but it should.

you are all those Zombie fans as described. Not allowed to think anything negative.

Tannehill is ranked 21st so far in preseason for QB's.

8-4 with an inferior team was Moore. Tannehill can't break 500

Thanks for clarifying.

I will be honest here. There was one play where Moore was under pressure. Pocket collapsed, and he simply side stepped and threw it away. I'D like to see more of that from Ryan. But that said, his passes have so much more on them, he is so much more Athletic on the run. Saying you would rather have Moore , and he looked great the other night, shows a serious bias at least. Probably I think it's mote of a Jets fan Trolling us.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will be honest here. There was one play where
> Moore was under pressure. Pocket collapsed, and
> he simply side stepped and threw it away. I'D like
> to see more of that from Ryan. But that said, his
> passes have so much more on them, he is so much
> more Athletic on the run. Saying you would rather
> have Moore , and he looked great the other night,
> shows a serious bias at least. Probably I think
> it's mote of a Jets fan Trolling us.

****************************************************

Treasure, I'm taking it for granted in your sentence where you start out..."his passes have so much...." that you are speaking of RT?

Another thing to consider...RT has been playing against the opposing team's starters, whereas Moore went against the backups.

Moore is a traditional pocket passer. Tannehill is basically an option quarterback.

That explains it.

The scheme we are playing is one that suits a traditional pocket passer.

Of course, in preseason, both teams usually start with their starting lineups and quickly move to the backups because that's the point of preseason, to see what you've got.

So Tanny would have been playing against stronger competition, although on the other hand, Moore would have been playing with the second string offensive line.

But back to you dolphin.

You are also dolfan1, the Patriots and Brady lover.

So why don't you just also put in your usual dolfan1 message that we should be doing this or that like the Patsies and that we will never defeat them.

captkoi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I will be honest here. There was one play where
> > Moore was under pressure. Pocket collapsed,
> and
> > he simply side stepped and threw it away. I'D
> like
> > to see more of that from Ryan. But that said,
> his
> > passes have so much more on them, he is so much
> > more Athletic on the run. Saying you would
> rather
> > have Moore , and he looked great the other
> night,
> > shows a serious bias at least. Probably I think
> > it's mote of a Jets fan Trolling us.
>
> **************************************************
> **
>
> Treasure, I'm taking it for granted in your
> sentence where you start out..."his passes have so
> much...." that you are speaking of RT?
>
> Another thing to consider...RT has been playing
> against the opposing team's starters, whereas
> Moore went against the backups.



Yes. God yes. Tanny has so much "moore" (get it?) of everything......but nobody is perfect. His pocket presense needs more work , I saw Moore avoid a few rushes That could have been sacks simply by throwing the ball away. Might be a maturity thing. He just doesn't want to give up on the play , and throwing it away is essentially that , so he hangs on to it.

But saying he has no upside whatsoever , is such an obvious Troll move. This whole thread. I wish JC would just ban him already.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Moore should clearly be starter over Tannehill.
>
> Will never happen of course, but it should.
>
> you are all those Zombie fans as described. Not
> allowed to think anything negative.
>
> Tannehill is ranked 21st so far in preseason for
> QB's.
>
> 8-4 with an inferior team was Moore. Tannehill
> can't break 500

There you go making shit up again!

Matt Moore's record in 2011 was 6-7. Miami was 6-10 in Moore's only year as a starter.

JoeFootball Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolphin Wrote:
> -------------------------------------
>
> There you go making shit up again!
>
> Matt Moore's record in 2011 was 6-7. Miami was
> 6-10 in Moore's only year as a starter.


Don't confuse him with facts! Moore had a healthy Jake Long back then too.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

Thirteen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dammit, I looked at it. And I KNOW better.


ROTFALMFAO.

You need to go back and look that up again Joe. I dont think a guy wins team MVP by going 6-7, but you can lie if you want.

I hate the Pats, not sure where anything other then that ever came from.

I watched the replay last night. It was OBVIOUS Moore looked way better then Tannehill. I would have thought for sure Tannehill was the backup (which he should be.)

There were 2 passes in the 2 minute drive that I've not seen RT make ever, that were just beautiful. Both to Matthews.

Moore plays so much faster, his decisions are so much quicker, his accuracy is better. Just amazing how much better he is the RT.

You should really check those facts before you post them. They have him not even starting the Bills game yet....

They also have him starting games he did not.

Matt Moore, entering midseason with almost no offseason or reps with the first team offense, posted these numbers on a new team. He had no chance to develop timing with his receivers and very little time to learn the new offense that he was entering. Despite this, Moore had a 6-6 record as a starter.

If Moore can post a .500 record in that sort of situation, imagine what he could do with a full offseason. Moore could very possibly be a successful starter with a system designed for him and a training camp that includes practice with the first team offense.


Nice try though,,,, I'd give you a C-

Props to Treasure for actually admitting that Moore did some good things out there!

Dolphin is a troll PR!(K Guys.

poor Samsam3738..... should i get an 800 number for you so you cant talk to someone about your issues?

Two sources for 2011. Both state the same thing. But we should rely on your recollection? or should I say, distortion of the facts? Yeah right.

Face it. You are wrong or just making shit up again.

8-4 record? How in the wide world of sports did we get an extra 2 wins in 2011? Are you re-writing the record books now as well? What a joke.

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> poor Samsam3738..... should i get an 800 number
> for you so you cant talk to someone about your
> issues?


I am a dolphins fanatic posting on a dolphins message board.

You are either a jets or pats fan posting on a dolphins message board.

Looks to me like you are the one that has issues.

PS. You were even busted as posting trash as dolfin1....(Another handle you had)

PS2. You are a definite troll.

Hey where is dolfin1 anyways. He hasn't posted no more since you were caught.

Are you too ashamed?

Why do you guys insist on feeding the troll?

Ignore it and it will go away and argue with itself about how Brock Jensen should be our starting QB.

Boredom

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why do you guys insist on feeding the troll?
>
> Ignore it and it will go away and argue with
> itself about how Brock Jensen should be our
> starting QB.


Brock Jensen?....Yes i remember that one LOL.

Matt Moore stinks. You stink. This thread stinks.

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Props to Treasure for actually admitting that
> Moore did some good things out there!


That's what good Dolphins fans do. We look for the good in everyone. The better our back up , the better our Team will be. You prove post after post what a douchbag you are because Ryan Tannehill is the best QB prospect to come along since 1983. And for you to not ever back him. you seem to look for any negativity , it proves one of Two things.

1) You are a Troll Jets fan.
2) You just a sick bastard. Up your medicine amounts.

Either way I couldn't give a left nut. The less you post means the better the Dolphins and Ryan Tannehill are doing. Both GOOD things.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

dolfin, or dolfan1, again, Tannehill was playing against first team opposition, Moore was playing against second string and draftee opposition.

And as to your Pats question, go back and look at your prior posts as dolfan1.