Moore still out playing Tannehill
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dolphin1 dolphin PR!(K has been busted.
>
>
> But i tell ya he is a dam masochist taking so much
> abuse from everyone.
>
>
> But i know for sure he has no life is over 50 and
> lives in his moms basement.
>
> Thats why he is a troll.
TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dolphin1 dolphin PR!(K has been busted.
> >
> >
> >
>
> I bet he has a heck of a handshake though!
I wouldn't shake his hand and that's NOT about football. It's about the other thing he's been shaking his hand with.
dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Despite this, Moore had a 6-6 record as a starter.
> 6-3 in the last 9 games...
>
> Still having trouble reading huh Joe.....keep
> working on it....
>
> Tannehill is below average; ranked what 26th
> ?..... he is a great athelete and seems like a
> great guy, but that is as far as I would go.
That's a bit different than the 8-4 record you were spouting off about though, isn't it?
Didn't have too much trouble reading that fabrication.
Treasure. I like Tannehill fine, he seems like a good kid.
I do not like him as the QB of my team because he is just not good. He was ranked somewhere around 24th in the leauge, that is below average. he CANNOT throw a deep ball, missed AGAIN the other night. Those are TD's and points, something that wins football games. It boggles the mind that people cant associate those 2 things.
He is slow in his reads. Check out the out pass he threw to Wallace in the Dallas game that is being show as a highlight. Wallace is open a good 3 to 4 seconds before Tannehill throws him the ball.
He has no feel for the pass rush.
His delivery is slow.
His yards record, big deal, this is a passing league now, and when you are behind you HAVE to throw the football.
dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Treasure. I like Tannehill fine, he seems like a
> good kid.
>
> I do not like him as the QB of my team because he
> is just not good. He was ranked somewhere around
> 24th in the leauge, that is below average. he
> CANNOT throw a deep ball, missed AGAIN the other
> night. Those are TD's and points, something that
> wins football games. It boggles the mind that
> people cant associate those 2 things.
>
> He is slow in his reads. Check out the out pass he
> threw to Wallace in the Dallas game that is being
> show as a highlight. Wallace is open a good 3 to 4
> seconds before Tannehill throws him the ball.
>
> He has no feel for the pass rush.
>
> His delivery is slow.
>
> His yards record, big deal, this is a passing
> league now, and when you are behind you HAVE to
> throw the football.
Even if SOME of that were true. Why can't you see the positives?
Over 7000 Yds in 2 seasons. TOP 5 EVER.
Extremely athletic and can throw on the run better then most.
NOT injury Prone. 58 sacks and he got up and dusted himself off everytime. Go ask RGIII how that's working out for him.
Maturity /leadership. Guy handled himself like a Pro from day 1. Go ask the Browns how Manzeil is working out.
The problems Tannehill has had can be corrected. He was a receiver in most of his college days. Ever season he gets better. He is developing into something so special and your crazy insane bias is disturbing at the least. Seek help.
TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolphin Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Treasure. I like Tannehill fine, he seems like
> a
> > good kid.
> >
> > I do not like him as the QB of my team because
> he
> > is just not good. He was ranked somewhere
> around
> > 24th in the leauge, that is below average. he
> > CANNOT throw a deep ball, missed AGAIN the
> other
> > night. Those are TD's and points, something
> that
> > wins football games. It boggles the mind that
> > people cant associate those 2 things.
> >
> > He is slow in his reads. Check out the out pass
> he
> > threw to Wallace in the Dallas game that is
> being
> > show as a highlight. Wallace is open a good 3 to
> 4
> > seconds before Tannehill throws him the ball.
> >
> > He has no feel for the pass rush.
> >
> > His delivery is slow.
> >
> > His yards record, big deal, this is a passing
> > league now, and when you are behind you HAVE to
> > throw the football.
>
>
> Even if SOME of that were true. Why can't you see
> the positives?
>
> Over 7000 Yds in 2 seasons. TOP 5 EVER.
>
> Extremely athletic and can throw on the run better
> then most.
>
> NOT injury Prone. 58 sacks and he got up and
> dusted himself off everytime. Go ask RGIII how
> that's working out for him.
>
> Maturity /leadership. Guy handled himself like a
> Pro from day 1. Go ask the Browns how Manzeil is
> working out.
>
> The problems Tannehill has had can be corrected.
> He was a receiver in most of his college days.
> Ever season he gets better. He is developing into
> something so special and your crazy insane bias is
> disturbing at the least. Seek help.
All those reasons are THE EXACT same reasons why he hates Tannehill! Jealousy because he has to live with either Geno or EJ. haven't figured out which yet.
dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont need another person to agree with me
> because I know I am right.
>
> I still have no idea how you think I'm the same
> poster because someone agreed with me.
>
> Based on that illogical thinking all of you are
> the same poster because you agree on Tannehill..
> LOL
I have to clap for you for that excellent example of lawyer weaseling. Although you are probably not a lawyer, you make the profession proud.
Of course, the problem is your PREMISE.
Your premise is that we say you are another poster because that poster "AGREED" with you.
That's not why we say you are the same, the reason is instead because we were arguing with you and in the midst of a heated "back and forth," you answered a post using another website identity.