I heard McShay on the radio the other day. He said he hates doing this 2016 mock but the powers that be at ESPN demand it.

In THAT case, we all gotta eat.

The Devil made me do it!

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL. He's predicting the 2016 draft????????????
>
> Good thing is that if he's right, he brags about
> his genius.
>
> If he's wrong, and there's about a 97 percent
> chance he's wrong, he'll say, "Hey, whaddaya
> expect? It was a year ahead prediction dependent
> on not only the upcoming NFL Season but the
> upcoming college season."

Yeah, they gave him a choice: Put out grades for this years draft, or do a super early mock for next years draft. He's dead-set against grading a draft hours after its over. He quite correctly thinks it to be a waste of time.

At least with the mock for the next draft he just gets a list of players out there for draft fans to start thinking about.

Whoa. Nobody else quoted me. Peeky-peek??

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Whoa. Nobody else quoted me. Peeky-peek??


I unblocked you months ago after you PM bombed me out of the blue.

How else am I supposed to report your insults and personal attacks to the moderators?

I'd love to be able to block you again, and no doubt you'll give me plenty of reasons. But what's the point when I get several PM's every time you take an unwarranted shot at me?

Someday you'll go to far and get banned and this will be a MUCH better site. Until then I'll sift through your nonsense and report what needs to be reported.

I won't be responding to you, at least intentionally. This original response was intended for JSM08's post.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I did not PM bomb you. We were pm-ing each other
> and copying JC on each pm until you decided you
> couldn't keep up and announced that you were going
> to block me.
>


That's a lie. I haven't PM'd you in god knows how long and even then, only in reply. I prefer it when you don't exist to me.

If you'd like I can post the PM's. I have nothing to hide.


Better you ignore me and I ignore you. Better for everyone.

Besides, I promised the powers that be I wouldn't clutter the board by arguing with crazy.

And knowing the child you are, you'll want to appeal to Curt or JC on this basis of that last post, but as an Attorney, I've covered myself on every basis.

YOU PUBLICLY ON THE CHATBOARD said I had "pm bomb"ed you. So if you can say that in general terms without violating the rules, and particularly if it's a LIE as it is, I'm allowed to defend myself by showing the actual lists of pms without any inside content.

It would indeed be unjust to allow you to make a FALSE statement about the number of pms I sent you and then use publication of the the true LISTS of pms thus showing the falsehood of the your statement as a cause for indicating that I, the attacked person, have violated the rules.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We are not allowed to discuss contents of PMs on
> the board. But YOU WERE THE FIRST ONE TO ACCUSE
> ME OF "pm bombing" you and I'm entitled to show
> this and defend myself.
>
> Thus, since you lied and said that I had pm bombed
> you..........
>
> here are a list of the pms between us that were
> the subject of your rant.
>
> The first grouping is from my "INBOX"
>
> the second is from my "SENT" box
>
> As can be seen there are equal pms going back and
> forth, that means for each pm there is a
> response.
>
> I have neither sent nor received any pms from you
> AFTER the latest date below, which was in October
> of last year.
>
> INBOX
> 10/14/2014 03:15PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war THE Truth
> 10/08/2014 08:09AM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war JC
> 10/08/2014 12:47AM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war JC
> 10/07/2014 06:10PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war THE Truth
> 10/07/2014 05:18PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war THE Truth
> 10/07/2014 02:04PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war THE Truth
>
>
> SENT ITEMS
> 10/14/2014 03:46PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war JC Yes
> 10/08/2014 02:36PM
> Sorry JC Yes
> 10/07/2014 10:09PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war THE Truth Yes
> 10/07/2014 10:06PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war 2 recipients
> Yes
> 10/07/2014 02:54PM
> Re: Looks like it's back to war 2 recipients
> Yes
> 10/07/2014 01:21PM
> Looks like it's back to war 2 recipients Yes
>
> Both lists are pretty much equal in that both of
> us were pm-ing each other in the same amount,
> which wasn't that much as you make it out to be.
>
> So either you have dementia or you are out right
> lying about me "pm bombing" you while you just sat
> back receiving the pms and not responding WHICH
> JUST GOES TO PROVE THAT.............


All of those were in response to your PM in October suggesting that "it looks like we are back to war" and the subsequent exchanges. Had you not PM'd me, I'd have NEVER PM'd you.

As I said. I'd be happy to post the contents of those pm's. I have ZERO to hide. In fact I'd LOVE for everyone to get a real look at the depths of your insanity.

The title, "Looks like we are back to war" was me commenting on you REJECTING a truce. Don't try to mislead.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And knowing the child you are, you'll want to
> appeal to Curt or JC on this basis of that last
> post, but as an Attorney, I've covered myself on
> every basis.
>
> YOU PUBLICLY ON THE CHATBOARD said I had "pm
> bomb"ed you. So if you can say that in general
> terms without violating the rules, and
> particularly if it's a LIE as it is, I'm allowed
> to defend myself by showing the actual lists of
> pms without any inside content.


The funny thing about the PM system on this board Bob is that if you don't check off the "Keep a copy in my sent items" box then you don't save a copy of the PMS you have sent.

I'm gonna guess at this point that you missed that box back in January.



>
> It would indeed be unjust to allow you to make a
> FALSE statement about the number of pms I sent you
> and then use publication of the the true LISTS of
> pms thus showing the falsehood of the your
> statement as a cause for indicating that I, the
> attacked person, have violated the rules.

What rules bob? Where did any of us sign a contract that PM's were ABSOLUTELY private communications?

Trust me when I say that you do not want me to post those messages and I have ALL of them, going back to when I was a moderator. I'd be happy to, because you are a tool and you deserve the humiliation that would come with them.

I apologize for quoting your post by mistake. My bad. I was on my phone and it happened.

But let it go Bob. Go back to ignoring me and I'll ignore you.

Its best that way.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The title, "Looks like we are back to war" was me
> commenting on you REJECTING a truce. Don't try to
> mislead.


More bullshit.

You chose that title for a PM that YOU sent me and JC as a response to your delusional interpretation of one of my posts in this forum.

I'm not the one trying to mislead anyone. Like I said... I'd be more than happy to dump EVERY word we've ever exchanged in a PM into a thread and let folks see just how utterly batshit insane/paranoid you actually are.

Let it go Bob... let it go. If we keep this up, neither of us will be posting here any longer. I left once on my own. I doubt it would be so easy a transition for you.

You are a case, ....basket that is. And I have no fear of you posting that I wrote. I was genuinely concerned that you were having a nervous breakdown. You will just show the rest of the board why I was concerned.

OMG

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

And THAT was a bonafide hi-jacking.

........................................

The Clown Show Continues



-

Derrick Henry would be awesome.

But, any pick in the 2016 first round is going to be awesome. It is the best draft talent I've ever evaluated... if the underclassman expected to come out, actually do.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"