Why didn't we get Sanchez? Instead we get henne. What a difference between these 2 Sanchez is much much better. Watching him come back in the clutch with the texans. Henne could never do what he just did.

Of course it helps that the NFL allows the Jets to acquire elite receivers for nothing.

Bet the house on the Jets to win the Superbowl. The NFL really, really, really wants it to happen.

< already has my bet in. It's jets vs Philly. No question about it. I'm happy for JT he gets a ring

Uhhh...Sanchez was drafted #5. We picked 25th and got Vontae Davis (a future pro bowler). Does that answer your question?

Thanks for clearing that up. Let's hope we get Luck

Sanchez was a gift from Mangina.

Well, there were people on this board arguing that Sanchez stunk and that Henne stunk even worse.

Moreover, the NY press was against him.

but I sat back and watched Sanchez in all of his years at USC and he was the best to play the game there in a LONG TIME.

Sanchez sucks.

The pick we blew was Ryan.

After that Flacco.

After that NO QB's drafted by these idiots (Pat White = NO Q and NO QB even on the dev squad. All their eggs in the Henne basket...

Like I said, there were people on this board who said Sanchez sucks.

Sanchez is good, but he plays behind an all pro line with all pro receivers.

sconigli Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sanchez is good, but he plays behind an all pro
> line with all pro receivers.

And a former All-Pro RB.

LT another gift from the NFL!

What is the point of having a salary cap?

Exactly about the salary cap. I say no salary cap and let Ross and woody battle it out on what to spend to make us winners

We could have signed Brees, Vick, LT but chose not to. Is it our OL, we did a lot better last year?

sorry, how did the NFL "gift" the jets any of their players? are they supposed to block a trade just because the other team is too stupid to make a better one?

sanchez has the "it" factor, that henne doesn't seem have, sorry to say. it's what separates good qbs from the long line of those with physical tools who never amounted to anything.

Yup he has the "it" factor while we are left with, umm the "nothing factor"

Sanchez sucks and will always suck.

But not as much as you guys are sucking his balls.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

Thank you Aqua and Orange!!!

I want to smash Sanchez's face in whenever I look at him. Please don't post about how awesome he is and how much you want him. He's not on this team. He's a Jet. Therefore he is the enemy. I hate Mark Sanchez. I don't want Mark Sanchez. I want a QB of our own that will be an elite QB. I don't care to drool over who our mortal enemies have on their roster. I only drool at the thought of beating them.

Thats how we roll.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

There is a big difference from saying the guys sucks just because he is a jet ( that is blind stupidity) and saying the guy sucks because you just feel he is not a good player regardless of what team he plays for. I think Brady is the best in the game. As for Sanchez, well he has a better line than Henne and better receivers, with the exception of Marshall, than henne. I think he is over hyped hell I can do good with that squad!

As for why we didn't get....

LT.....why? If we don't run the ball who cares who is back there.

Vick.....Why? Anybody who said Vick would have this kind of year after prison would of been lauged at. Sides he also has a very good supporting cast.

Brees....Won't argue that but again MOnday morning QB. He was a risk at the time and everyone on this board would love to have him but he was a risk

I love ya, Ranger. You know that. You are definately my bud.



But, I have to say Brady and Sanchez suck. I hate both of them, call me whatever you want...I dont care. But I will call myself a Dolphins fan.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

ranger1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Brees....Won't argue that but again MOnday morning
> QB. He was a risk at the time and everyone on this
> board would love to have him but he was a risk

I don't believe he as any more of a risk than the guy we ended up signing instead (Culpepper). Also, he wasn't a risk at all when we passed him over in the draft. Instead we ended up with that HoF CB, Jamar Fletcher. Nuff said.

31 other teams passed up him as well.

We arent the only team that passed on him.

Do you realize over the last 10 years we have passed on about 75-85% of all the Pro Bowlers that were drafted???


But guess what? So did everybody else.

The "we passed on so and so" talk is stupid.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/21/2010 06:01PM by Aqua&Orange.

The fact remains, without good coaching a ton of talent means NOTHING.

Aqua Aqua Aqua. I am not saying I love Brady but I respect him. I think the guy is the best in the game righ now. You telling me you wouldn't take Brady on the Dolphins? As for Sanchez I agree. Over hyped with a good supporting cast. I am not sure how we fix our problems but passing on so much talent in the draft leads me to believe that the scouting department needs to be re-evaluated.

Monte- If you are looking to get a QB and 1 option has a shoulder injury and the other has a knee injury I can see where the thinking comes from. If you were taking a RB and 1 has a shoulder and one has a knee then you prob go for the soulder guy. Based on position Culpepper was the better choice. Let's be clear I would of taken Brees over Culpepper any day but at this point I see why it was done. Still a bonehead move.

ranger1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Monte- If you are looking to get a QB and 1 option
> has a shoulder injury and the other has a knee
> injury I can see where the thinking comes from. If
> you were taking a RB and 1 has a shoulder and one
> has a knee then you prob go for the soulder guy.
> Based on position Culpepper was the better choice.
> Let's be clear I would of taken Brees over
> Culpepper any day but at this point I see why it
> was done. Still a bonehead move.

Problem is, our doctors never evaluated Brees. Saban made that decision for himself. Saban was a good college coach, but had no idea how to truly evaluate talent. Look at Brees' and Culpepper's last years before they were traded. Brees is the clear choice.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/21/2010 06:16PM by montequi.

The doctors did look at Brees. They had several specialist look at him and no one could give any kind of certainty. Won't argue Saban sucked!

Why is Sanchez so good exactly? Last season was not really good for him, he threw a lot of picks and his completion percentage is not great either.

He's much better this year than last because the team is loaded with talent.