TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > TCPF QUOTE: I'm good if we do becuase we can
> > afford it this yr. But Trenches is the way to
> go.
> >
> >
> > You tell chren you did not want a OLineman in
> the
> > top rounds then you contradict yourself saying
> > tenches is the way to go.
> >
> >
> > WHich is it?
> >
> >
> > You are dr jeckyl and MR Hyde dressed as a cop.
>
>
> Options my little lackey ( uniformed manservant)
> because I know english is not your best strength.
>
RESPONSE: There you go...like the little boy with a 5 year mentality in the White House, it's easier for you to think in categories instead of addressing the issues...attacking your opponent because his native language is different.
>
> I know you and Mr. back in 67' at Purdue want a
> definitive answer just to mount a huge defense and
> counter attack against it. Becuase winning an
> argument is all your after not whats best for this
> team.
RESPONSE: As Reagan like to say, "There you go again." Summarizing your opponents argument instead of addressing it.
NOW.
>
> We are a completely different team then last year
> at this time. We have options at QB.
RESPONSE: No we are the same...we have backups at QB but we still don't have our Griese or Marino or Elway.
>However going
> in that direct has merit IF we are positive about
> a guy ,
.......not just doing it because we are throwing
> darts and hoping enough darts will eventually get
> us a bullseye.
RESPONSE: "throwing darts"????? you act like there are no draft experts in the nation or on any of the nfl teams.
>
> Where we dont have options is Offensive Line.
We
> can go free agency but that gets expensive
> quickly.
REPONSE: wE CAN ALSO USE THE LOWER HALF OF THE FIRST ROUND AND THE SECOND AND THIRD ROUND TO PICK THE BEST LINEMEN LIKE MOST TEAMS THAT HAVE THEIR BEST QUARTERBACK DO. NOT TAKE THEM WITH A TOP FIVE PICK LIKE YOU WANT TO.
>So I'm actually not for taking Andrew at
> #5 . Trading out to get multiple picks makes more
> sense and we still have 2 first rounders left.
RESPONSE: That would be okay if we had our QB of the future but we don't.
> UNLESS we are sure about a player. We need to hit
> on them no matter who it is.
RESPONSE: Of course we need to hit on anyone we pick at any point. That's saying nothing.
>WE GOT OPTIONS.
RESPONSE: FOR THAT MATTER, WE COULD TRADE ALL OF OUR PICKS FOR 6TH AND 7TH ROUND PICKS.
So
> many avenues this team can pursue and not many are
> wrong. Not even taking a QB at #5. But they better
> be positive about him. I dont think that player
> exists except for Burrows. But we can afford a
> project like Tua if the other needs are addressed.
> OPTIONS. We got a ton of them .
RESPONSE: There are always options for any course of action on getting anything done. We are here to rate the options. DUH!
>
> My dream draft though would be a move out of #5
> down to a team who has a hard on for a player . We
> take the best RB available and Olinemen with the
> extra picks. Best players available with the other
> 2 1st rounders. A stud DT , S Safety because I
> think Reshad Jones days are numbered.
>
> Thats my thought process and I'm backing it with
> facts on how I reached those conclusions.
RESPONSE: Really, did I miss that backing with facts above???? Or are you just saying that you have those facts in reserve????
>
> If you can do the same about picking a QB at #5
> I'd be happy to hear it .
RESPONSE: No because I don't think it makes sense not to pick the best quarterback available AT THE TOP SPOT AVAILABLE!!!
THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM, you think that you can pick LESS THAN THE TOP QUARTERBACK AS LONG AS YOU PICK THE TOP LINEMAN.
>So silly analogies about
> cars engines and lotto ticket bullshit.
RESPONSE: So you don't get either the engine or the lotto ticket analogy. What I'm wondering is if the rest of the readers have your low level of IQ and don't get what I'm saying either. I have to give up on you.
> Hey you
> know what? Maybe its just your gut. You feel that
> way and thats it. Cool.
RESPONSE: Oh!!! If someone takes a position based on no more that GUT FEELING that's okay with you but if someone makes an assessment of need then you've got problems with that. As my big sister used to love to say 'HO-KAYYYYYYY'.
>BUT you need to just state
> it and move on.
RESPONSE: I did. The QB is the most important part of the team.
>and when your wrong......as you
> were about Tannehill consistently be a man and
> admit it.
RESPONSE: I WAS WRONG ABOUT TANNEHILL????? ARE YOU SAYING HE PLAYED GREAT HERE??????
OH.....YOU ARE SAYING THAT HE IS PLAYING GREAT IN TENNESSEE??? WELL THIS MAY BE ABOVE YOUR IQ (THAT'S INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT) BUT I SAID WE WERE PLAYING HIM THE WRONG SCHEME. I TALKED ABOUT Big Springs High School and Texas A & M where Tanny previously played. Go back and read it dummy (like Fred Sanford says to Lamont).
>
> I'll be thinking of you watching the Titans in the
> playoffs no matter who wins.
RESPONSE: I'll be doing the same and wishing Tannehill well and unlike you will be regretting that we didn't use his talents properly as Tennessee is doing.