I'd rather have Tanney than pm at this point in their careeres

You realize what you're saying, Chambers? What you are saying is, in effect, that Peyton could NOT have won any of the close games we lost under Tanny and ALSO Peyton would have lost some of the games Tanny won.

That kinda a hard sell.

but if "at this point in his career," which I TOOK TO MEAN at their talent skills NOW what you mean INSTEAD is Peyton's remaining years of productivity INSTEAD OF Tannehill's remaining years of productivity, then of course because all you are saying is that you'd take an unproven young guy for the future years than a guy about to retire.

It's that stupid John Fox, he's trying to make Peyton a pocket passer........he needs to put him in the read option

Denver losing just sealed the fate of them....going to foxboro is a disaster waiting to happen for Denver.

NE has home field throughout.

dolfan1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Denver losing just sealed the fate of
> them....going to foxboro is a disaster waiting to
> happen for Denver.

Maybe, maybe not. Denver sure doesn't look good enough to beat the Pats, but they already lost to them in Denver, so the home field for Denver isn't much of an advantage for them vs the Pats this year. Maybe they can beat the patsies in NE it it comes down to that. Here's hoping.

I hate to say it but a NE/Seattle SB is probably the best game...with NE losing of course.

dolphaholic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's that stupid John Fox, he's trying to make
> Peyton a pocket passer........he needs to put him
> in the read option

Damn, holic. You finally SEEN THE LIGHT!

JC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolfan1 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Denver losing just sealed the fate of
> > them....going to foxboro is a disaster waiting
> to
> > happen for Denver.
>
> Maybe, maybe not. Denver sure doesn't look good
> enough to beat the Pats, but they already lost to
> them in Denver, so the home field for Denver isn't
> much of an advantage for them vs the Pats this
> year. Maybe they can beat the patsies in NE it it
> comes down to that. Here's hoping.

Wasn't that game in NE?

I think that the only two teams in the AFC that have any chance at all to go into NE and win are the Steelers and the Ravens.

dolphaholic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JC Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > dolfan1 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Denver losing just sealed the fate of
> > > them....going to foxboro is a disaster
> waiting
> > to
> > > happen for Denver.
> >
> > Maybe, maybe not. Denver sure doesn't look good
> > enough to beat the Pats, but they already lost
> to
> > them in Denver, so the home field for Denver
> isn't
> > much of an advantage for them vs the Pats this
> > year. Maybe they can beat the patsies in NE it
> it
> > comes down to that. Here's hoping.
>
> Wasn't that game in NE?


I thought it was in Denver..and posters on here were praising Bellichick's flying the Patsies to Denver immediately after their previous road game so that they could grow accustomed to the altitude in advance.

You put Tanny on the Broncos and they're a superbowl contender.

Denver will lose early in the playoffs. Not having Thomas is killing them

dolphaholic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JC Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > dolphaholic Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > JC Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > dolfan1 Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Denver losing just sealed the fate of
> > > > > them....going to foxboro is a disaster
> > > waiting
> > > > to
> > > > > happen for Denver.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe, maybe not. Denver sure doesn't look
> > good
> > > > enough to beat the Pats, but they already
> > lost
> > > to
> > > > them in Denver, so the home field for
> Denver
> > > isn't
> > > > much of an advantage for them vs the Pats
> > this
> > > > year. Maybe they can beat the patsies in
> NE
> > it
> > > it
> > > > comes down to that. Here's hoping.
> > >
> > > Wasn't that game in NE?
> >
> >
> > I thought it was in Denver..and posters on here
> > were praising Bellichick's flying the Patsies
> to
> > Denver immediately after their previous road
> game
> > so that they could grow accustomed to the
> altitude
> > in advance.
>
>
> Nope that was San Diego a few weeks ago. I looked
> it up, it was Den at NE Nov. 2nd


YOU'RE RIGHT!!!

And I was too damn lazy to look it up myself. I was def. thinking of San Diego.

All good JC.......I win