Could King Carl & Ross be eyeing Manning?
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
That would be totally consistent with the Dolphin ownership and totally asinine. When we should be grabbing a quarterback of the future, we get a quarterback of the past.
I agree with ChyrenB. Peyton may still have a few good years left if he's able to return from his neck injuries, but to bet the farm on him under the circumstances is not prudent because it jeopardizes the Club's future. We need a youthful QB with 10+ years of prime time play in him.
Peyton is one of the greats. A HOFamer for sure. This is not the time for him to become a Dolphin or Raider etc. He needs to stay with the Colts.
Im all for it. If, and it's a big *IF*, we still go after one of the big QB's to groom under Manning.
If Manning is not a Colt, it means he will have been cut. They owe him $28 million, there only option is to pay him or cut him, no team will trade for him.
So, if he is here, it means he will have been cut, and we got him without giving up any picks.
If we get Manning, we will go to the AFC Championship next year if he is healthy. But I also want us to groom a young QB under Manning.
I agree A&O. In fact, I believe if we get Manning, shore up the O-Line, and land a good coach, we could be in the <gasp!> Superbowl next year! The AFC isn't that strong right now. NE has a suspect defense. Pitt and Baltimore are inconsistent. If we were in the NFC I'd say we probably wouldn't beat N.O. or G.B., but in the AFC it's entirely possible!
That is, unless we meet Tim Tebow in the playoffs
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/21/2011 03:45AM by montequi.
Aqua&Orange Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Im all for it. If, and it's a big *IF*, we still
> go after one of the big QB's to groom under
> Manning.
>
> If Manning is not a Colt, it means he will have
> been cut. They owe him $28 million, there only
> option is to pay him or cut him, no team will
> trade for him.
>
> So, if he is here, it means he will have been cut,
> and we got him without giving up any picks.
>
> If we get Manning, we will go to the AFC
> Championship next year if he is healthy. But I
> also want us to groom a young QB under Manning.
>
> NOT MATT MOORE!
I think teams would trade for Peyton Manning. If somebody is after him they are going to trade to guarantee they get him. If he is just cut there will be a lot more competition for him. He is one of the most prolific passers in the game I'm sure he will bring some trade value.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/21/2011 04:01AM by sleekdogg.
Aqua&Orange Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is already being reported that the Colts will
> release him, if something happens which will allow
> him to chose wherever he wants to go.
Wow. I think there will be alot of suitors if thats the case. I think the colts could actually get something pretty good for him. Where do you think he would choose to go? A strong oline has to be a priority at this point for him.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/21/2011 04:33AM by sleekdogg.
I'm surprised A & O at your position. First off, you always said that the top priority is to get a young QB in THIS draft.
In order to get Barkley RGIII or even Landry Jones, you are going to need trading material.
Trading material you won't have if you have to deal with Indy for Peyton.
If Indy releases him and he is a friend agent then he becomes the enemy of our cap room so even if we DO have that opportunity, it could cut down on our ability to deal with potential draftees in positions OTHER than QB.
Secondly, even if Peyton is healthy for now, how fragile would he be next year. You might have the young QB (even if you could get him) learning from J. P. Losman.
Lastly, who is better for the ego of a young Barkley to be sitting behind and learning, Peyton Manning or Matt Moore.
You may not like Matt Moore, A & O, but I think most of the posters on this board would be uncomfortable with Peyton's ego on a young QB than Moore's lesser ego.
chyren, im not sure what you mean with Peyton's ego. he would be ideal to learn from as he is a student of the game and seems to be an all around good person that would not begrudge a young QB of getting better. he is not brett favre.
however, i agree that we could not afford to get peyton. we don't want to trade for him and give up valuable trade assets. we are not so far under the cap that we can afford a 15 million dollars salary. we have other holes in the roster that money can be spent on and this FA has a lot of top unrestricted FA talent.
manning will not be traded. first, no one will want to take on that huge salary. second, if indy decides to move on, they will let payton have ultimate freedom on going where he wants, which will mean making him a FA. and if he was a FA, why would he want to come here? I could see him in SF 1000 times over before he'd come and play for this crew.
i see your point chyren. i agree that he may be uncomfortable with the situation and that he has enough class to not make any fuss. i would assume that after being bounced in Indy for a hot shot rookie that he will choose a team that does not have a hot shot rookie anyways
Yeah, he'd probably be looking at a team that is just one ingredient away where he could spend his last three years on top as opposed to getting the sh_t beat out of him while he tries to show a young QB the ropes.
I have to respectfully disagree with chren here.........i think i would like to have that rookie qb learning from manning than learning from moore. Its like night and day.
About the egos everybody in the nfl have egos chren i know where you are coming from though. I understand your point.
Anyways i think the rookie qb could learn a whole lot more from payton than he is going to learn from moore who hasnt won a thing and is a 2nd string qb at best.
ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, he'd probably be looking at a team that is
> just one ingredient away where he could spend his
> last three years on top as opposed to getting the
> sh_t beat out of him while he tries to show a
> young QB the ropes.
We definitely fall into that category. I think the 'Skins are further away than we are. Our issue is the coaching uncertainty. Who we get as coach will help determine a lot of this.
A & ) - Im all for it. If, and it's a big *IF*, we still go after one of the big QB's to groom under Manning.
A kind of funny quote that came directly from manning a few weeks back, when a reporter asked him do you think you'll go into coaching.
Peyton said, well maybe some day,but so far my record is 0-11.
Thought it was a funny way to say that you can't coach someone who doesn't have the skill set and instincts to put the knowledge into action in real time