I officially want to do something really mean to Irlends Breakfast.....
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
ghotirule Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obviously Ireland doesn't agree with your
> assessment of Mallet's value.
>
> Do you pee on the cereal of everyone that doesn't
> agree with your views on trivial matters?
Who said anything about Peeing in someones cereal? You are one sick Puppy! I was just gonna switch his coffee unleaded to Leaded. You need to seek some professional help.
berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> earth, moon, and stars. come on man, they traded a
> 5th and 7th round pick. or john nablone and jd
> folsom
Gave up 3 for 1. For a RB. Might last us 5 yrs. That 5th and 7th rounder could have gotten us Ricky Stanzi AT LEAST. We dumped it. Free QB for nothing.
I think you see the total stupidy but just refuse to admit it.
gave up 3 for 1? no, one of those picks were going to be used regardless. we gave up 2 lower round picks to move up in the 3d. and if the draft chart has any relevance, we fleeced the skins according to the chart. If we gave up a high pick next year in the trade, I'd be pissed, but trading a 3d and 2 low picks for a 2d, that's not a bad move. if you don't like who we took, that's one thing, but I bet if we took Mallett with the pick you wouldn't be complaining about 3 for 1.
Your 100% right. We are only a RB away from winning the Superbowl. We did so well this past decade with a pretty good rushing attack. How many times did we make the playoffs?
Hmmmmm, the 17 yrs we had a killer QB I seem to remember a Much better offense. Maybe thats just me , your right. We did so much better with the Killer running game. Hell......what are the Teams with QB's like Payton, Big Ben, and Brady even thinking? Winning all those championships was just a fluke. a New RB is the answer!!
Take this whole draft , just replace Thomas with Mallet and we are a way better team. Give Ronnie brown another chance instead of Henne. he @#$%& deserves it at least.
ok so you're entire gripe is that we didn't take mallett in the second. that's legit, especially if you think he's a franchise QB, but it doesn't change the fact that we did get some promising players and we filed a lot of needs. and didn't reach for the most part (for a change)
berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok so you're entire gripe is that we didn't take
> mallett in the second. that's legit, especially if
> you think he's a franchise QB, but it doesn't
> change the fact that we did get some promising
> players and we filed a lot of needs. and didn't
> reach for the most part (for a change)
RESPONSE: The fact remains that we could have had both Pouncey and Mallett or Ingram and Mallet.
We end up with Pouncey.
Now let's see... Which two of the three positions is most valuable in football, quarterback, running back, or offensive line.
sconigli Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Getting a dominant center can really solidify the
> line for the next decade (read: disasters like
> last season will not occur).
>
> Kudos to Ireland for choosing Pouncey.
RESPONSE: But we could have had Pouncey AND Mallet.
But we dont know if Mallett, Thomas, Pouncey, Ingram or any of these other guys that were drafted this weekend will ever amount to a hill f beans.
If we passed on Pouncey and Thomas, and picked Ingram and Mallett and Ingram and Mallett turn out to be busts, then we were wrong. And it could go the other way.
We will find out who is rigt. Jeff Ireland, Tony Sparano, or you, Treasure, Phinkiss, and BNF.
Treasure....I feel ya man....pass on Ingram ad Mallett...but everyone assumes that they could be a bust but pouncey or any other picks we chose couldn't be a bust....but hey...we got a center over a #1 running back and possible great QB!
Same logic....No guts no Glory....year after year same ol story!
TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So you are OK with them going gangbusters and
> trading the earth moon and stars for a RB, But
> Not a QB they just stated that they DID want?
>
> Then your are either very dumb, or just ignorant.
> Maybe both.
RESPONSE: And what's worse, they could have taken the BEST RB in the draft at no. 15, instead of using it on the 'best' center (who some argued was really the best) and then still gotten what was talentwise perhaps the 2nd or 3rd best QB with the next pick.
ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> RESPONSE: And what's worse, they could have taken
> the BEST RB in the draft at no. 15, instead of
> using it on the 'best' center (who some argued was
> really the best) and then still gotten what was
> talentwise perhaps the 2nd or 3rd best QB with the
> next pick.
SIGH. Take my gun. Someone please hold it before I do an impression of Kurt Cobain.
samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You wanna do something really mean to ireland?
>
> Make mia1 go to breakfast with him. That will ruin
> the experience.
Only if he eats a box of exlax and promises to explode Wet farts in every bathroom of the home .
Treasure....Why you talkin about pullin a Cobain??....As Patton once said...."IT'S NOT FOR YOU TO DIE FOR YOUR COUNTRY....LET PATRIOT FANS DIE INSTEAD".....something like that!
ghotirule Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obviously Ireland doesn't agree with your
> assessment of Mallet's value.
>
> Do you pee on the cereal of everyone that doesn't
> agree with your views on trivial matters?
No, but Bill Belichek does. I believe I'd stick with his assessment over Ireland. I also wouldn't call not having a QB in the NFL a trivial matter.