tebow tore it up in college. locker did not. big difference between the two.

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tebow tore it up in college. locker did not. big
> difference between the two.

Locker tore it up the season before last when he had decent talent around him. He didn't when his team was decimated. Tebow was surrounded with tremendous talent his whole college career. I still see a strong parallel here.

I get the feeling Locker is gonna be a bit of a "sleeper."

I know he's already on the map, but the kid has the essential tools to be good in the NFL. He's certainly not a plug-and-play dude but with a little time he could be a real player. He has the right 'tude.

R1 @15 I don't know. But if we can trade down into the mid 20's and add a 3rd he could be interesting. With the 3rd take Stanzi and then we have some talent to develop.

Either way, I am still riding the 2QB drafted horse all the way to the Finnish line where gorgeous blondes are waiting...

Oh yea.

Come get some stank baby!

The main problem with Locker throughout his entire career is his *HORRIBLE* accuracy. And that is a *MAJOR* problem.

I am not sure if he ever had a season where he completed 60% of his passes, which is terrible.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

There is a school of thought that you can't teach accuracy. Guys either have it, or they don't. College QBs with accuracy issues, see Brady Quinn, get a major red flag.

And a big thing with Locker is that they say his accuracy is ok once he gets outside the pocket. That makes the red flag even bigger. He's not accurate from the pocket, and has a hard time finding throwing lanes and seeing the field. Those issues will only be magnified in the NFL.

His accuracy improves out of the pocket? That is bizzare.

That is scary.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"