He can talk smack all he wants, He was beat on one fade in the endzone. If Henne had thrown the ball with more air under it, it's a TD and Finnegan is a non-factor.

When we opened the offense up prior to Henne getting hurt, we looked like a different offense than any other time of the season.

Our RB's are old and I am starting to think that we are going to have to use the passing game to open up the running game, which is opposite of what we have always done prior.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

Aqua&Orange Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When we opened the offense up prior to Henne
> getting hurt, we looked like a different offense
> than any other time of the season.
>
> Our RB's are old and I am starting to think that
> we are going to have to use the passing game to
> open up the running game, which is opposite of
> what we have always done prior.

That's the biggest problem with the offense. Philosophically, the whole idea of this team is to be a grind it our running offense. That's what they planned on, and that's what they are built for. But, the running game is lousy, thanks to two RB who have both lost a step, a lousy interior line, and no deep threat at WR to get the safeties out of the box. The end result is that the offense is not what the coaching staff set out to make it. And they are reluctant to change their philosophy too dramatically.

I think our offensive philosiphy might need to be like the gaytriots.

Pass to open up the run. Shotgun formation, dink and dunk.

Seems to have worked better for us.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

I saw where Cortland said that. My question to him would be how badly would we have beaten them if they didn't know what play was coming?

The wildcat helped out alot, other than that while Henne was in there it was prob the most boring blan predictable offense in the league.

I hope Thigpen switch's it up alot.