After all these years, you finally going to give me credit on Ryan Mallett? You said he would be a franchise QB, I said he would be a turd.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

I also said he would be a good QB. Oh Well.

But I stand behind my decision at the time. We needed a QB not a injury prone RB with sticky fingers like Thomas. Until we got our starting franchise QB we needed to keep hitting it with competent 1st and 2nd round drafts and then build a Team around him.

I'm so glad we Got Tannehill. he was the better pick over RGIII . I even saw Luck throw a few INT's the other night. He's very good, but he's not exactly Lighting up scoreboards of late.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

RG111 will never be the same. I remember saying he wouldnt last too long in this league.

Well there it is. He is right now as fragile as a feather. One good pop and he is back on the inactive list...

Im also glad we took Tannehill over RG111.

And to think what the redsking gave to take him. OUCH.

If RG111 takes as many sacks as the real deal did last year, RG111 would be on a wheelchair by now.

Haha... Always good to hear from you A&O...


But I believe what I said at the time was that he had an elite skill set and that the off the field stuff was concerning. That if he passed the sniff test in interviews and during the background check that he should be a top 10 pick. If he doesn't, I wouldn't have him on my draft board.

It's tough sitting behind a 1st ballot HOF qb. There's certainly no evidence to suggest he's a good qb, but there really Isn't enough evidence to say he's a turd yet, is there?

Of course, we didn't pass on Ryan Mallett to take Tannehill because they were different years so it's kinda weird to argue between the two.

We did pass on him to take Daniel Thomas, the Lebanese. I still have not seen enough from Daniel Thomas to think he was worth it.

Mallett has proved zero so far but I'll bet Thomas will find it hard to even stay on our roster. Did you see those two kids play a couple of days ago??????? Not to mention Knowshon.

Thomas will be cut in the next cut down. What we had on the field sat night was better then anything I've seen since Rickey and Ronnie.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

Agreed.

Mallets should have been picked over Thomas no doubt.

we coulda had demarco murray instead of thomas. thanks ireland, you freaking moron

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

we traded up for Thomas.... what a waste

TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I also said he would be a good QB. Oh Well.
>
> But I stand behind my decision at the time. We
> needed a QB not a injury prone RB with sticky
> fingers like Thomas. Until we got our starting
> franchise QB we needed to keep hitting it with
> competent 1st and 2nd round drafts and then build
> a Team around him.
>
> I'm so glad we Got Tannehill. he was the better
> pick over RGIII . I even saw Luck throw a few
> INT's the other night. He's very good, but he's
> not exactly Lighting up scoreboards of late.

**********************************************

To be honest, I'm not putting much stock into anything that is going on right now, as it is only preseason.

TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thomas will be cut in the next cut down. What we
> had on the field sat night was better then
> anything I've seen since Rickey and Ronnie.

******************************************************

Williams is big and powerful, with some speed.

Thomas is gone.