berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sickofit+1 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I use the handle Sickofit plus 1. That's the
> only
> > name I use on this site. I do not use multiple
> > handles. I am not Dolphin or any other poster
> but
> > sick of it plus one. Sorry to burst bubbles but
> > either one of you are the other two or they are
> > completely different posters.
>
>
> ok but yes or no: you used to post here under the
> name "mia1"?

He shouldn't answer that if he wants to keep posting. He got a lifetime ban.

If its him he's better off just continuing to post as a good member.

I am not chutthefup or however you spell it. Speaking of which where has he been?

Also where has Sickofit been too? Why since this had been brought up dolfan1 and dolphin been?

Are you now, or have you ever been, a poster that used another name and if so what?

All I can say is I currently since this account has been active for a year or so have not and do not come on here under any other handle!

LOL. A lawyer type answer to a lawyer's question.

Hehe I liked it too!

Stop asking him if he is other posters. he is probably not. I know he's not chatafkup b/c he is not clever enough to come up with that screen name. however he is most assuredly mia1 given his facebook links he's left here. and it's painfully obvious, given that he always ignores the question of whether he's mia1 and tries to confuse the issue by (truthfully, probably) denying he is all of the other posters you all ask him about.

anyway I personally don't care one way or the other. I never wanted mia1 banned and in his latest version he is less annoying that mia1 was, so I wouldn't want this guy to be banned either. but it would be nice for him to just come clean and own up to it.

that is all.

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

When does the Fing season start..........?

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

Amen well the season started today treasure! Training camp!!

another transparent dodge by mia1/sickofit

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Washington Warriors it is.

JoeFootball Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Washington Warriors it is.


Makes sense. That way they can keep the logo.

How about the Washington Wops?

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How about the Washington Wops?


"WASPS" is probably more appropriate.

Washington Corruption

Anyone who thinks that's racist is looking to be a victim and needs to get a grip.

Comboys and Indians'. That's all there is to it. Drama Queens

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

i wonder if they will stop at Redskins, are the Kansas City Chiefs next? Cleveland Indians? Atlanta Braves? Chicago Blackhawks? Not to mention all the NCAA teams that might be reviewed now.

If the team is named after the first head coach and he was good with it why change it.

Washington Wetbacks?

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Washington Wetbacks?


LOL The Washington lazy Mexicans

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

Again, there is a distinct difference between Wetback, Coons, and Wops, on one hand, and on the other hand, Redskins or Blackskins or Buffalo Soldiers.

And another thing that occurs to me is that the action by the patent office is one that is interesting if you give it a little thought. Funny too.

So the patent office declares the Redskin symbol to be racist.

It's way of dealing with it is to TAKE AWAY the patent protection.

WHAT THAT MEANS HOWEVER is that the Washington Redskin organization is not the ONLY ones who can use the logo.

Therefore, that means that the only way the Redskins can be hurt.......

and indeed the way the patent office INTENDS THAT THEY BE HURT......


is that more and more people and organizations CAN NOW USE THE SAME LOGO.

LOL. So they intend to get rid of this hated, racist, symbol by MAKING IT LIKELY THAT IT IS SPREAD AND UTILIZED BY MORE ENTITIES THAN THE Washington NFL Team.

You'd think they'd want to stop the utilization of the mascot, NOT INCREASE ITS USE.

I certainly cannot for the life of me figure why the Washington Redskin organization WOULD BE MOTIVATED TO STOP USING THE MASCOT just because others are encroaching on and duplicating their mascot.

That's just ass-backwards but typical of how you kids think nowadays.

toko34 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i wonder if they will stop at Redskins, are the
> Kansas City Chiefs next? Cleveland Indians?
> Atlanta Braves? Chicago Blackhawks? Not to
> mention all the NCAA teams that might be reviewed
> now.

Chiefs isn't offensive. Indians is not exactly correct (unless they're referring to people from India) but it's not considered offensive either. Not sure about Braves or Blackhawks.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And another thing that occurs to me is that the
> action by the patent office is one that is
> interesting if you give it a little thought.
> Funny too.
>
> So the patent office declares the Redskin symbol
> to be racist.
>
> It's way of dealing with it is to TAKE AWAY the
> patent protection.
>
> WHAT THAT MEANS HOWEVER is that the Washington
> Redskin organization is not the ONLY ones who can
> use the logo.
>
> Therefore, that means that the only way the
> Redskins can be hurt.......
>
> and indeed the way the patent office INTENDS THAT
> THEY BE HURT......
>
>
> is that more and more people and organizations CAN
> NOW USE THE SAME LOGO.
>
> LOL. So they intend to get rid of this hated,
> racist, symbol by MAKING IT LIKELY THAT IT IS
> SPREAD AND UTILIZED BY MORE ENTITIES THAN THE
> Washington NFL Team.
>
> You'd think they'd want to stop the utilization of
> the mascot, NOT INCREASE ITS USE.
>
> I certainly cannot for the life of me figure why
> the Washington Redskin organization WOULD BE
> MOTIVATED TO STOP USING THE MASCOT just because
> others are encroaching on and duplicating their
> mascot.
>
> That's just ass-backwards but typical of how you
> kids think nowadays.

This is one time one of your ramblings kinda makes sense.......weird, I know

montequi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> toko34 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > i wonder if they will stop at Redskins, are the
> > Kansas City Chiefs next? Cleveland Indians?
> > Atlanta Braves? Chicago Blackhawks? Not to
> > mention all the NCAA teams that might be
> reviewed
> > now.
>
> Chiefs isn't offensive. Indians is not exactly
> correct (unless they're referring to people from
> India) but it's not considered offensive either.
> Not sure about Braves or Blackhawks.


Blackhawks is the name of a local Indian chief. Not sure how that would be offensive.

Braves is another term for warrior. I don't see how that's an insult or how it could be offensive.