LOL...The real Deal is starting to prove people wrong. Im enyoing that.


From 32 to 6. Not bad at all.

Nice find A&O........

LOL. I had to take a 6 week hiatus from this place because of it. It was so obvious to me that many here were not even Dolphins fans , Just pats and Jets fans in disguise. I've been watching Tanny closely since he came out , Live and it was so apparent that he was a different athlete then any others before him. When he rolls out he is at his best. I'd like to see his completion stats on Bootlegging vs. staying in the pocket. He takes hits like a wide receiver, and he can tackle too. If you you think about it he is the most rounded QB in the league. Run, Pass, I think we need to get a Top OC next season though to really use him to his Top potential.

Great Post A&O. and that's the TRUTH.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

I wasn't referring to you C52. You have been critical but pretty fair in your assessment of RT.

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

eesti Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wasn't referring to you C52. You have been
> critical but pretty fair in your assessment of RT.


thanks I appreciate it eesti.....

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

You two make sure to clean each other up now. No saliva stains.

Sickofit+1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You two make sure to clean each other up now. No
> saliva stains.


Chatafkup

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

Lol.

I was tough on Tannehill, but he is starting to do what I said he needed to do so thus he is playing better.

Still needs to throw a better deep ball.

Yes he does but don't expect a vast improvement on that Untill next season.

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was tough on Tannehill, but he is starting to do
> what I said he needed to do so thus he is playing
> better.
>
> Still needs to throw a better deep ball.


You were "tough" on Tannehill? Just admit it. You were WRONG about Tannehill. You had no insight and didn't see what 95% of the NFL saw.

Don't act like you are his QB coach and the reason he is better is because you were tough on him. LOL

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

eesti Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolphin Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I was tough on Tannehill, but he is starting to
> do
> > what I said he needed to do so thus he is
> playing
> > better.
> >
> > Still needs to throw a better deep ball.
>
>
> You were "tough" on Tannehill? Just admit it. You
> were WRONG about Tannehill. You had no insight and
> didn't see what 95% of the NFL saw.
>
> Don't act like you are his QB coach and the reason
> he is better is because you were tough on him. LOL

Eesti is right here Dolphin, but its ok to be wrong.

dolfin and dolfin1 have been wrong so many times ive lost count.

Hey I am just glad we Finally got our franchise QB.

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolfin and dolfin1 have been wrong so many times
> ive lost count.


LOL, I'm going to just start calling them Barack.

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Crowder52 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Sickofit+1 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You two make sure to clean each other up now.
> > No
> > > saliva stains.
> >
> >
> > Chatafkup
>
> Now that's gotta be in competition for one of the
> best and most clever one word post in this board's
> history.

Not my word, that clever word is his, I just borrowed it......

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sickofit+1 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You two make sure to clean each other up now.
> No
> > saliva stains.
>
>
> Chatafkup

HEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I have a patent on it since 2006 When I got here j/k



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/19/2013 12:17PM by chatafkup.

Patent? I thought you were sick of it..... or do you just want me to chatafkup about it?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

Both. Lol

Tanne is coming along fine, #6 uhh. I don't know how the hell PFF calculates their stats some folks live by them. I stick w/ the nfl official stats. Bottom line Tanne is starting to win games for us he is maturing. Hopefully next year players like Sims, Wallace and our new lb's will kick more *** after having a year in our system under their belts.

Only 4 QB's in the NFL are top 10 in comp. %, Yards, and TD's and their team has a winning record.

Who are those 4 QB's?


Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Drew Brees, and yes,..... Ryan Tannehill.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

You mean the NFL.com QB rating that gave Alex Smith a perfect rating in part for throwing 3 dump-off passes (0 yards from scrimmage) to Jamaal Charles?

0 yard dump pass - 49 yard (run) TD
0 yard dump pass - 39 yard (run) TD
0 yard dump pass - 16 yard (run) TD

He also threw a 20 yards pass (wheel route) to Charles that went for a 71 yard TD.

So the running ability of Jamaal Charles makes Smith a perfect QB?

But if you want to stick with the "official NFL stats"....

Tannehill is 10th in yards, 8th in TD's, 10th in most passes over 20 yards and 4th in most passes completed over 40 yards AND 13th in completion %.

He also has four, 4th quarter comebacks this year alone.

That would seem to put him somehwere in the top 10...no?

The NFL QB rating also has Jake Locker, Sam Bradford, Colt MCCoy, Matt Flynn and Matt Cassell as "better" QB's.

The ESPN QBR rating penalizes QB's for every sack.

So one rating gives the QB credit for others work and the other assigns blame for others mistakes....but PFF is more flawed?

Some have said that PFF is meaningless because it's a bunch of people who have never played football, sitting around calculating stats. Does anyone think the other rating systems have Bob Griese and Don Shula in some room assigning value and numbers? Was the mathematical formula invented by Bill Walsh?

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

eesti Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You mean the NFL.com QB rating that gave Alex
> Smith a perfect rating in part for throwing 3
> dump-off passes (0 yards from scrimmage) to Jamaal
> Charles?
>
> 0 yard dump pass - 49 yard (run) TD
> 0 yard dump pass - 39 yard (run) TD
> 0 yard dump pass - 16 yard (run) TD
>
> He also threw a 20 yards pass (wheel route) to
> Charles that went for a 71 yard TD.
>
> So the running ability of Jamaal Charles makes
> Smith a perfect QB?
>
> But if you want to stick with the "official NFL
> stats"....
>
> Tannehill is 10th in yards, 8th in TD's, 10th in
> most passes over 20 yards and 4th in most passes
> completed over 40 yards AND 13th in completion %.
>
> He also has four, 4th quarter comebacks this year
> alone.
>
> That would seem to put him somehwere in the top
> 10...no?
>
> The NFL QB rating also has Jake Locker, Sam
> Bradford, Colt MCCoy, Matt Flynn and Matt Cassell
> as "better" QB's.
>
> The ESPN QBR rating penalizes QB's for every
> sack.
>
> So one rating gives the QB credit for others work
> and the other assigns blame for others
> mistakes....but PFF is more flawed?
>
> Some have said that PFF is meaningless because
> it's a bunch of people who have never played
> football, sitting around calculating stats. Does
> anyone think the other rating systems have Bob
> Griese and Don Shula in some room assigning value
> and numbers? Was the mathematical formula invented
> by Bill Walsh?


How many guys would you take, for the rest of their careers (not what they've done) ahead of RT today?

P. Manning, Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Luck, Rivers, Ryan, Flacco and maybe Newton?

TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > dolfin and dolfin1 have been wrong so many
> times
> > ive lost count.
>
>
> LOL, I'm going to just start calling them Barack.
>


LOL. Oh well at least dolfin and dolfin1 aint going to get this country to the poor house.

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > samsam3738 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > dolfin and dolfin1 have been wrong so many
> > times
> > > ive lost count.
> >
> >
> > LOL, I'm going to just start calling them
> Barack.
> >
>
>
> LOL. Oh well at least dolfin and dolfin1 aint
> going to get this country to the poor house.


This thread is headed to the poor house, and the out-house.

We need to keep our discussions about football.