Home
THIS SITE
  About Phins.com
  Contact Us
TEAM NEWS
  Team Info
  Twitter Feeds
  News Wire
  Phins RSS Feed
GAMES
  Schedule
PERSONNEL
  Roster
  Depth Chart
FOR THE FANS
  Forums
  Places To Watch
HISTORY
  Team History
  1972 Tribute
 
-- Advertisement --
Privacy Policy at Phins.com
 
  Phins.com Phorums
    News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links  
          Tannehill no Fiedler
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :  Phins.com Phorums The fastest message board... ever.
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel
Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: dolphan4545 ()
Date: October 30, 2013 02:55PM

I know that a lot of you didn't like Fiedler, some even hated him, but he had IT, he just didn't have the tools to make anything of IT. If T-hill, with all his tools, had Fiedler's heart and fire, we'd really have something.

Rick

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: chatafkup ()
Date: October 30, 2013 03:57PM

dolphan4545 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know that a lot of you didn't like Fiedler, some
> even hated him, but he had IT, he just didn't have
> the tools to make anything of IT. If T-hill, with
> all his tools, had Fiedler's heart and fire, we'd
> really have something.

All levity aside, he was a winner!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: steviec13 ()
Date: October 30, 2013 04:43PM

Tannehill needs to grow up with football sense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: BigNastyFish ()
Date: October 30, 2013 06:34PM

OMG. Fiedler sucked. He was a journeyman N F L coitusback. Nothing legit whatsoever. Total sham. Piece of brisket crap...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: chatafkup ()
Date: October 30, 2013 07:55PM

BigNastyFish Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OMG. Fiedler sucked. He was a journeyman N F L
> coitusback. Nothing legit whatsoever. Total sham.
> Piece of brisket crap...
Fair enough, but he found a way to win....along with one of the best defenses helped too.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: berkeley223 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 04:21AM

Before he got injured against Denver Feidler was playing great. after that game his career nosedived and he was never the same.

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: JC ()
Date: October 31, 2013 05:19AM

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Before he got injured against Denver Feidler was
> playing great. after that game his career
> nosedived and he was never the same.


That's how I remember it…he injured his thumb on a defender's helmet and could never throw the same afterward.

He was not great, but he was intelligent and could lead offensive drives. I'll never forget when he ran that winning touchdown against the Raiders. Fiedler played with heart and posted a fair number of wins for us.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: Hooligan2 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 05:27AM

It just seemed a waste to have a top 3 defense plus the leading rusher in the NFL at the same time and not enough of a QB to get to the play-offs.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: berkeley223 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 06:00AM

hooligan, true but I blame Wanny more than anything for us not getting into the playoffs that season. wanny single handedly destroyed this franchise and I'll never forgive him that

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: jsm08 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 06:48AM

I can't believe it's come to this.

Jay fiedler was horrible. He had some good stretches but over all was not a qb that was going to lead a team.

if by "it" you mean the penchant to throw a horrible into in crunch time then I agree.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 09:42AM

I've though t about this before. Say what you want Fiedler had leadership, smarts and guts...just no arm. Kind of like Matt Moore, he was fine until EVERYBODY in the stadium KNEW he had to throw it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 09:59AM

jsm08 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can't believe it's come to this.
>
> Jay fiedler was horrible. He had some good
> stretches but over all was not a qb that was going
> to lead a team.
>
> if by "it" you mean the penchant to throw a
> horrible into in crunch time then I agree.

Everybody is downing our recent past AFTER Marino from the coaches like Wanny Sparano, Cameron and the quarterbacks like Fiedler, etc.

DON'T BE SO FU*KING CRITICAL, we are probably IN THE WORST PERIOD OF OUR FRANCHISE right NOW!!!!!

I don't include Tanny in that but almost every other element of the team ESPECIALLY THE HEAD COACH!!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 10:28AM

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jsm08 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I can't believe it's come to this.
> >
> > Jay fiedler was horrible. He had some good
> > stretches but over all was not a qb that was
> going
> > to lead a team.
> >
> > if by "it" you mean the penchant to throw a
> > horrible into in crunch time then I agree.
>
> Everybody is downing our recent past AFTER Marino
> from the coaches like Wanny Sparano, Cameron and
> the quarterbacks like Fiedler, etc.
>
> DON'T BE SO FU*KING CRITICAL, we are probably IN
> THE WORST PERIOD OF OUR FRANCHISE right NOW!!!!!
>
> I don't include Tanny in that but almost every
> other element of the team ESPECIALLY THE HEAD
> COACH!!!!!

I will include TANNY AND THE REST. I really don't see how an objective person can make a reasonable, results based argument that ANYTHING we have right now is much better than it has been in the last 10-12 years. Ugh.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: mizzou15 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 10:42AM

What the hell did we win w/ Fielder. Give me Tanne over Fielder any freaking day. Fiedler is the most overrated player in Dolphin history.

Losing makes some fans say idiotic things.

What the hell we were not winning shit in those days either. I would not trade these years to back to the JJ Wanny years. Stop the madness. Go look at the drafts from 1998-2001 they sucked! At least Ireland gets some players. We use to get 1 or 2 players out of an entire draft.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 10:53AM

mizzou15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What the hell did we win w/ Fielder. Give me Tanne
> over Fielder any freaking day. Fiedler is the most
> overrated player in Dolphin history.


Uh...the AFC East Championship in 2000 and the last playoff win we have had the same year. I wouldn't say he was 'over rated' because I really don't think he's 'rated' at all, but his first couple of years we did make the playoffs and actually WON a playoff game.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:04AM

Come to think of it we have made the playoffs three times since Marino lefat and each time we have had a cast-off Jet QB at the helm...wonder if Sanchez is available?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.....lol! just kidding, just kidding...grinning smiley

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: mizzou15 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:10AM

"Uh...the AFC East Championship in 2000 and the last playoff win w"

Your quote is noted and the shoe is in my mouth. I still disliked Fiedler and always thought how further we could go if we did not have someone elses third string qb under center back in those times.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:17AM

If you think our franchise, offensive line, coaching, playcalling is any better, if not worse than previous regimes, you are delusional. I make an exception for Tanny because I don't think the coaching is utilizing his skill sets properly.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:18AM

mizzou15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Uh...the AFC East Championship in 2000 and the
> last playoff win w"
>
> Your quote is noted and the shoe is in my mouth. I
> still disliked Fiedler and always thought how
> further we could go if we did not have someone
> elses third string qb under center back in those
> times.

No argument from me there bro. Fiedler was the first in a long line of journeymen, retreads and projects meant by one narcissistic coach or the other to 'prove' HE didn't need a great QB to win. I had high hopes for Tanny but I just don't see the personal OR team improvement you would expect from a true franchise level guy. It's just frustrating as h3ll.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:25AM

KB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Fiedler was the
> first in a long line of journeymen, retreads and
> projects meant by one narcissistic coach or the
> other to 'prove' HE didn't need a great QB to win.

I'm only commenting on the above to say that if you think Philbin does not fit that category then you are sorely mistaken. Not that Tanny is great or not great but Foolbin thinks he is great enough that regardless of the QB, OL, or their performance, he doesn't need them to win or to play in a different way than he designs in order to win.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:27AM

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you think our franchise, offensive line,
> coaching, playcalling is any better, if not worse
> than previous regimes, you are delusional. I make
> an exception for Tanny because I don't think the
> coaching is utilizing his skill sets properly.

Agree about the state of the franchise but I INCLUDE Tannehill because after all he WAS a first round draft pick and, while the coaches may be stifling his mobility, I seriously doubt they are telling him "Lock on to receivers, miss wide open guys, take sack after sack, and oh yea, turn the ball over a few times if you can..." He's is just not showing the improvement one would expect from a second year guy who is 'the answer'...My opinion of course.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: KB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:29AM

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> KB Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> Fiedler was the
> > first in a long line of journeymen, retreads
> and
> > projects meant by one narcissistic coach or the
> > other to 'prove' HE didn't need a great QB to
> win.
>
> I'm only commenting on the above to say that if
> you think Philbin does not fit that category then
> you are sorely mistaken. Not that Tanny is great
> or not great but Foolbin thinks he is great enough
> that regardless of the QB, OL, or their
> performance, he doesn't need them to win or to
> play in a different way than he designs in order
> to win.

Chyren, somewhere you have mis-interpreted me (or maybe I mis-typed) but I was AGREEING with you about the state of the franchise, coaching, etc...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: berkeley223 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:31AM

I had really high hope for Philbin but now it seems like he's a clown like all the rest. wtf, Dawn Aponte is his spirtual guide?

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: mizzou15 ()
Date: October 31, 2013 11:52AM

Hindsight is BS but I really liked the way the old coaching staff had the team playing after Sporano was fired. My only question was could Knowles handle the HC position. Daboll and Mike Nolan were capable coordinators.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: October 31, 2013 12:00PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Tannehill no Fiedler
Posted by: BigNastyFish ()
Date: October 31, 2013 12:42PM

Philbin is a corporate clone -- that's why Ross was so impressed with him... He's a prime example of the non-creative mindset that dictates the incessant recycled ass crap to the masses...

And precisely WHY a legit HC ain't never gonna pitch tent in Dolphin cap as long as Ross is calling the shots...

It starts at the TOP and trickles down -- like Reaganomics.

LOL.

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
Home Curt Fennell
Contact Us
DOLFAN in New England
TOP
   
© Phins.com. No portion of this site may be reproduced without
the express permission of the author, Curt Fennell. All rights reserved.