Without the pass interference drive we win this game
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Miami had a questionable PI call go there way, but I must disagree that Miami would have won the game if not for those two PI calls. They may have, but then again....
samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ravens 16
> Phins 20
> Refs 7 which they gave to the ravens.
>
>
> It was the phins against the ravens and the refs
> at the same time.
If Miami had played a good all around game and lost with the help of the PI call, I would agree with you. Miami didn't deserve to win that game (although I wish they had, of course).
captkoi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ravens 16
> > Phins 20
> > Refs 7 which they gave to the ravens.
> >
> >
> > It was the phins against the ravens and the
> refs
> > at the same time.
>
> **************************************************
> *
>
> If Miami had played a good all around game and
> lost with the help of the PI call, I would agree
> with you. Miami didn't deserve to win that game
> (although I wish they had, of course).
I agree, the PI calls on the opening drive of the second half, helped set the tone for the second half... Without those calls, we stop them from scoring a TD, and have momentum going our way... Instead those calls help secure momentum for most of the second half in the Ravens direction... Besides the fact we only lost by 3, and that drive gave them 7 pts, instead of none or 3... The difference in the game...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche
The second PI call on Grimes on the first drive of the 2nd half was insane. It was offensive PI . Grimes would have picked it off if he hadn't been interfered with.
ChambersDeepBall Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The second PI call on Grimes on the first drive of
> the 2nd half was insane. It was offensive PI .
> Grimes would have picked it off if he hadn't been
> interfered with.
The refs were so deep in the pocket of gamblers they were unable to see the ceiling light.
samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> captkoi Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > samsam3738 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Ravens 16
> > > Phins 20
> > > Refs 7 which they gave to the ravens.
> > >
> > >
> > > It was the phins against the ravens and the
> > refs
> > > at the same time.
> >
> >
> **************************************************
>
> > *
> >
> > If Miami had played a good all around game and
> > lost with the help of the PI call, I would
> agree
> > with you. Miami didn't deserve to win that game
> > (although I wish they had, of course).
>
>
> THe ravens didn't deserve to win the game either.
*****************************************
No, they didn't and as I mentioned on a different post, the Ravens played poorly and won the game. What does that say about our Fins?