If you blame this loss even a little on RT, you are an absolute idiot or a troll.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

It was a team loss, period but,
an elite QB would have made the throws in that final drive to get the team into a position to at least tie the score.
I don't blame Tannehill for the loss but, he certainly fell short when he had a very real chance of tying the game.

Dolfanking like always is full of it.
Lol...the real deal will be ok. The defense gave game away

How many interceptable balls did Luck throw today? 3-6. Somewhere in that range.

How many interceptable balls did Tannehill throw today? 0.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

BUT LET ALL US DOLPHIN FANS GIVE A BIG THUMBS UP TO CHUCK PAGANO AND KEEP HIM IN OUR PRAYERS!!!!!!

>
> If the colts defense played like Miami's did
> today, this is a runaway victory for Miami. Pure
> and simple.
>
And if RT played close to the level of Luck we win today... I think Luck played incredible more then our defense totally sucking... Luck was that good and our QB was not on the same level as Luck, we just couldn't keep up with Luck... Tannehill had a chance to win the game and he was horrible accuracy on that last drive plain and simple.. That was disappointing... When Luck had a chance on a game winning drive, he succeeded, when RT had the chance, he did not... Sucks

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

crowder 52 wrote....
And if RT played close to the level of Luck we win today...



And if our defense dbs and lbs who have hands of stone......intercept all of lucks terrible throws we win the game....

Lets all twist things to our liking shall we....

Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > If the colts defense played like Miami's did
> > today, this is a runaway victory for Miami.
> Pure
> > and simple.
> >
> And if RT played close to the level of Luck we
> win today... I think Luck played incredible more
> then our defense totally sucking... Luck was that
> good and our QB was not on the same level as Luck,
> we just couldn't keep up with Luck... Tannehill
> had a chance to win the game and he was horrible
> accuracy on that last drive plain and simple..
> That was disappointing... When Luck had a chance
> on a game winning drive, he succeeded, when RT had
> the chance, he did not... Sucks


MIA C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS
Tannehill 22/38 290 7.6 1 0 2-9

IND C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS
Luck 30/48 433 9.0 2 0 1-14

RT's completion percentage even with the overthrown/missed passes at the end of the game and his "below average" receiving core was 58%.

Luck's was just a little bit better at 62.5% with nearly zero pash rush from Miami, throwing 10 more attempts, and a "slightly" higher quality receiving core. Granted he did have some drops from his receivers, but that even shows more evidence of Miami's defensive play because those receivers were wide open too. He even threw at least 3 passes that should have been no-brainer interception. RT didn't have a single pass that I can recall that hit a defender's hands and was dropped.

I don't know how anyone is saying that RT lost this game for Miami. He didn't. He had a chance to connect on some plays at the end that could have saved the game because of the shitty output from the defense, but anyone saying anything different than the defense giving up 13 of 19 1st downs on 3rd down, dropping sure interceptions, and poor tackling is directly the reasons Miami lost is just plain ignorant, or has a motive.

RT has given far less output in previous games (Jets game for expample, St Louis as well), and Miami has won. This was one of his better playing games.

Ihatebrady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> RT's completion percentage even with the
> overthrown/missed passes at the end of the game

For once someone acknowledges this.

RT's poor performance at the end of the game is a trend - this is not the first time.

The numbers matter not, if the QB can't close the deal. RT cannot close the deal.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> crowder 52 wrote....
> And if RT played close to the level of Luck we win
> today...
>
>
>
> And if our defense dbs and lbs who have hands of
> stone......intercept all of lucks terrible throws
> we win the game....
>
> Lets all twist things to our liking shall we....

The difference here is that QBs are paid to throw, while Defenders are paid to hit, not catch. If they could catch they'd be on offense.

Once again, people are other blaming players for not doing something extraordinary, while they overlook Tannehill's rather basic shortcomings.

Too many people around here are bigger fans of Tannehill than they are the team. They've been hope so bad for the next Dan Marino that they've begun to believe the hype. Sorry, but until Tannehill breaking down in pressure situations, the hype will be just hype and nothing more.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

Dolphanking....The difference here is that QBs are paid to throw, while Defenders are paid to hit, not catch.


DBs are paid to make plays period be it catch ints tackle etc...

Like i said lets twist things around to our own liking shall we?

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dolphanking....The difference here is that QBs are
> paid to throw, while Defenders are paid to hit,
> not catch.
>


>
> DBs are paid to make plays period be it catch ints
> tackle etc...
>
> Like i said lets twist things around to our own
> liking shall we?


Is he seriously blaming Tannehill for the loss Sam?

Wow.


one of the top defenses in the league gives up 516 yards to a rookie QB and a 3 point loss is the fault of a QB with a 90.9 passer rating and no INT's??

Nope...no agenda there....

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dolphanking....The difference here is that QBs
> are
> > paid to throw, while Defenders are paid to hit,
> > not catch.
> >
>
>
> >
> > DBs are paid to make plays period be it catch
> ints
> > tackle etc...
> >
> > Like i said lets twist things around to our own
> > liking shall we?
>
>
> Is he seriously blaming Tannehill for the loss
> Sam?
>
> Wow.
>
>
> one of the top defenses in the league gives up 516
> yards to a rookie QB and a 3 point loss is the
> fault of a QB with a 90.9 passer rating and no
> INT's??
>
> Nope...no agenda there....


He is definetely blaming tannehill on the loss....Hes blamed him on every loss and he hasnt given him any credit on any win.

I knew that was coming.....After a loss he has a lot to say.

He goes on a bussiness trip after every win LOL.

Ihatebrady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RT was 22/38 for 290 and a TD. He did just enough
> to win this game. The defense completely blew it.
> They could not stop them on 3rd down all day and
> zero pressure on luck let him pick them apart.
>
> The o line also blew it as well with the sacks and
> penalties. This was a worse game in my opinion
> than the texans game because of the expected
> progression this far in the season.
>
> Horrible loss that will have far reaching effects.
>
>
> I'll go on record and say they blow it next week
> as well and the season will be officially in the
> tank at that point.
>
> Even still, it will not be on RT. He's doing
> enough to win.


As I begrudgingly anticipated, they are currently sticking up the place en route to a blow out by one of the leagues worst teams. With that, they are getting gouged by both the run and passing games now. Complete dismantling.

And the season will be done at this point. Might as well start tinkering with positions.

I'd cut jake long tomorrow if it were up to me.

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> THE Truth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > samsam3738 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dolphanking....The difference here is that
> QBs
> > are
> > > paid to throw, while Defenders are paid to
> hit,
> > > not catch.
> > >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > DBs are paid to make plays period be it catch
> > ints
> > > tackle etc...
> > >
> > > Like i said lets twist things around to our
> own
> > > liking shall we?
> >
> >
> > Is he seriously blaming Tannehill for the loss
> > Sam?
> >
> > Wow.
> >
> >
> > one of the top defenses in the league gives up
> 516
> > yards to a rookie QB and a 3 point loss is the
> > fault of a QB with a 90.9 passer rating and no
> > INT's??
> >
> > Nope...no agenda there....
>
>
> He is definetely blaming tannehill on the
> loss....Hes blamed him on every loss and he hasnt
> given him any credit on any win.
>
> I knew that was coming.....After a loss he has a
> lot to say.
>
> He goes on a bussiness trip after every win LOL.


I didn't blame the loss on Tannehill, I pointed out that the QB once again didn't have what it takes to win in an adverse situation. Tannehill is not showing anything to indicate he is elite.

We pick the QB in the top ten (which was a reach). Then start the kid like he is some kind of phenom.

He is not a phenom. Not even close.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.