"A limited Tannehill is still better than an unlimited Matt Moore"
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Moore looked pretty good coming off the bench, into the game cold and especially against a perenial SB contender. He was ineffective in the no huddle plays but, that is to be expected. Mainly, he managed the game well, made some excellent throws and didn't turn the ball over. I want to see Tanny develop as much as anyone but, if he's not 100% then going with Moore is a no brainer. Newspaper columnists be damned.
Aqua&Orange Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anybody who thinks Moore is better than Tannehill
> when both are healthy, you are absolutely insane
> and know very little about football.
>
Matt Moore had a higher passer rating then Tannehill in 5 of his six games. The passer rating he had against the Jets 96, was 2 points lower passer rating then Moore avg for the last 6 games of the season... WHich was the 6th highest passer rating in the NFL during that stretch.... So in Moore's last seven games he has about a 97.5 passer rating... Tannehill in his 6 games games has a passer rating of 75 or so.... So I wouldnt say that people dont know about Football or are insane if they differ opinions from you, there is stats to back up what Dolphin said....
I am not here to get in another Tannehill argument, but I dont think you are being completely fair or honest about your evaluation and I think the stats I just presented more then tell that story...
Rushing your rookie franchsie QB back and playing him hurt is not the smartest move you can make with the guy you think is your franchise, when you have a solid player like Matt Moore to step in... A limited Tannehill should sit on the bench risking his future is not worth playing him early...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche
Crowder: Did you actually read the article? The author acknowledges that Moore had a higher QB rating than Tanny, but that's not the point. Tanny has a prototypical frame and smarts to match. He's got natural talent that make him better than Moore.
dolfin you might know more than joe philbin and ireland put together.............I mean they started tannehill instead of matt moore at the beginning of the season.
They might be wrong and you might be right.
You should apply for a coaching job. Maybe you can get this team straighned out.
Maybe we can get to the same level kansas city is right now with you as head master of operations.
Sometimes I wonder how bright the people on this board are. LOL. I guess I got my answer in the results of the poll I ran about the difference in the exit interviews.
The question is not whether Moore or RT is a better quarterback. It's not even whether Moore is better than an injured RT.
THE QUESTION IS DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO RISK FURTHER, MAYBE EVEN PERMANENT, INJURY TO TANNEHILL!!!!!!!
eesti Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are such a hypocrite. This is the second post
> in a few days where you call EVERYONE out for
> being stupid. Not just me which I expect from you
> but EVERYONE. So in your delusion, anyone who
> disagrees with you is of inferior intelligence.
> Actually 14 out of 17 people disagreed with you.
> That tells me you may be the dull one. So much for
> presenting a good argument counselor. LOL
RESPONSE: LOL. Did it ever occur to you that when you look at the human race as a whole, the higher in intelligence you get, the fewer people there are? But perhaps the reason you don't see that is........
Hard to tell sometimes if folks are legit Dolphin fans or just adversarial positionalists.
Point of fact:
Moore = a great "backup" QB and we're lucky to have a quality dude like him in the #2 slot.
Thill = an emerging QB savant (or at least partially "gifted" NFL coitusback) with immense upside and the benefit of having someone like Moore in a support role.
Why don't you yard birds listen to Philbin???
Matt Moore is a legit NFL football player. He's an excellent team player! He's a real pro. He's dedicated. The troops love him. Et cetera and et cetera! Stop trashing on the dude because you're just an asshole by doing so.
Thill is exceeding all our expectations and has the look of a top-shelf long-term solution @ the preeminent rock-chucker position. He's also pure class. Incredibly dedicated. High IQ. And...(fill in your NFL coitusback wish list "everything else".
it IS a lot easier to grade higher with fewer attempts. you can complete 66% of your passes if you just throw 3 and hit 2. or 100% if you throw one and complete it. pretty hard to complete 100% if you throw 10. I am not so good at math but I do get that.
________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
No in statistics it isn't... The more attempts just leads to more accuracy in the stat... If you throw 6 attempts and only complete 2 as Tannehill did last week the fewer attempts actually lead to a lower score... It is just as easy to grade low as high with fewer attempts becaus you have less room to make mistakes... The more attempts leads to a more accurate stat but it can go low or high before it balances out... A smaller sample size doesn't make your stats better just less accurate.. Sure if you have 3 passes and complete them all you look like a stud but if you have 3 passes and miss them all, you look very bad stats wise...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2012 08:00AM by Crowder52.