From what I understand, Moore has been invaluable to Tannehill's development and I believe Tannehill himself has made statements to this effect. Personally, I really like Matt Moore. He comes across as a high character guy from his interviews, teammates comments, and hard knocks and he plays with somewhat of a gunslinger mentality, which i prefer. I hope we at least offer Matt Moore backup money next year and if he gets a better offer with a chance to start then I will wish him best of luck. Honestly, if I was a team drafting a franchise QB next year then I would give serious consideration to bringing in Matt Moore as a mentor/stopgap/topbackup type guy.

Crowder, I firmly believe Zac Taylor(our QB coach) will be an NFL head coach one day. He has risen far in a short time and his limitations as a player were physical not mental. Our entire coaching staff is trending upwards.

Very few great players make great coaches.


Matter of fact, most great coaches were either average or below average football players in the NFL, if they even made it to the NFL.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, Anemone, that may be true. But what SamSam
> was saying is not that Tannehill could not learn
> from seeing Moore play, something I agree with on
> some level, but that Tannehill cannot learn
> anything from what Moore teaches him with Moore's
> mouth.


Chren .....NO No NO anemone has a point.....Tannehill will not learn a thing from watching moore play....because moore is an inferior player...I told you moore can give him a few pointers etc......that means he will have to talk to him.....Unless he does the talking with his hands like the deaf people.

Thats it iam not talking about this no more. Thats my believe,...


Just like your believe that the let go of vontae was wrong....and i disagree.....I saw the interview and saw nothing worng with it.

Lessons learned. In the military we spend lots of time examining into the foibles and successes of the past. This is done to learn the pitfalls as well as the smart and practical things to do.

Learning occurs constantly. Same applies, I believe on the field of play. Situations are similar but not exactly the same. What a more experienced player brings to the table is time and situational experience.

Tannehill can learn by watching films of Marino, Woodley, Griese, Earl Morral, and a host of other quarterbacks who have taken more snaps then he has. Learning pitfalls is just as important as learning how to excel at making a given play(s).

My preference is to see Tannehill play, if he is healthy to do so.

Tanny is still listed as questionable and so is Hartline.

Calling somebody "not intelligent" is a good way to get a non constructive flame war going. Among fans of the same team, that is not a good thing. Sam has a POV at the opposite end of the spectrum as DK and is just as stubborn in defending it. Nothing can be gained trying to get either to see things differently. Henry, you should know that by now.

Good advice, Hooligan but read it again. I did not say that he himself was not intelligent.

I said that "it is not intelligent to take a position that".

But I get you on your getting him to see things differently point and the rest of your advice.

Edited to add:

And Hooligan, he deserves what he gets for taking an "absolutist" position. Every since grade school we have been taught not to talk in absolutes.

But like DK, he is so emotionally invested in a position that his belief in that position gets the better of his common sense at times. Maybe not as much as DolfanKing but it is beginning to show.

Nobody is attacking Tannehill, SamSam but people don't like it any better when you attack Matt Moore. You are being a DolfanKing in reverse.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/03/2012 01:11PM by ChyrenB.

Tannehill starting today.

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ChyrenB Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Oh, Anemone, that may be true. But what
> SamSam
> > > was saying is not that Tannehill could not
> > learn
> > > from seeing Moore play, something I agree
> with
> > on
> > > some level, but that Tannehill cannot learn
> > > anything from what Moore teaches him with
> > Moore's
> > > mouth.
> >
> >
> > Chren .....NO No NO anemone has a
> > point.....Tannehill will not learn a thing from
> > watching moore play....because moore is an
> > inferior player...I told you moore can give him
> a
> > few pointers etc......that means he will have
> to
> > talk to him.....Unless he does the talking with
> > his hands like the deaf people.
> >
> > Thats it iam not talking about this no more.
> Thats
> > my believe,...
> >
> >
> > Just like your believe that the let go of
> vontae
> > was wrong....and i disagree.....I saw the
> > interview and saw nothing worng with it.
>
> RESPONSE: See that's your problem, SamSam. You
> jumble words and concepts up. That's why people
> don't agree with you. Above you said that you saw
> nothing wrong with the interview and THAT IS ON
> POINT.
>
> BUT BEFORE THAT YOU SAID " believe that the let go
> of Vontae was wrong." That's ass wrong! I never
> believed that. If you had said the second sentence
> only, you would get no argument but when you said
> the first sentence, you get a fight because you
> are just wrong on the historical fact.
>
> You gotta learn to communicate clearly.
>
> Even your statement that Tannehill can learn
> nothing from watching an inferior player talent
> wise play is wrong. If nothing else, you can
> learn mistakes NOT TO MAKE.
>
> Moreover, when Moore comes back to the sidelines,
> Tanny will ask him
>
> 1) Why did you choose to throw there instead of
> over there?
>
> 2) Why did you choose not to run instead of pass?
>
> 3) That pass was picked off, what did you see
> that made you throw it?
>
> 4) That receiver was WIDE OPEN and you were under
> a blitz, how did you know to throw it to him AT
> THAT SPOT when you obviously could not see him?
> .
>
> SamSam, it is not very intelligent to take the
> position that there are some people who can never
> be taught something by certain other people.


I still stand by what i say.....You thought the let go of vontae was all wrong or else you wouldnt be bytching about it.

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ChrenB....Nobody is attacking Tannehill, SamSam
> but people don't like it any better when you
> attack Matt Moore. You are being a DolfanKing in
> reverse.
>
>
> LOL now i know why people were pming me saying you
> were a nutcase....
>
> I never attacked moore.....I even said i was happy
> to have him on my team as long as he is a member
> of the phins i would support him....
>
> Dont twist things around for your own purpose
> chren...
>
> But i still stand wih my believe that tannehill is
> the future and moore is just a backup.
>
> Again........I SUPPORT MOORE.....Get that through
> your thick head...

Yeah, SamSam, you never attacked Moore. It's not attacking him when you say that he is an inferior quarterback and that he cannot teach Tannehill anything or to put it in your exact words he is an inferior "who can teach Tannehill nothing."

Yeah that's supporting him all the way.

And you actually say that I should get it through MY thick head that YOU SUPPORT MOORE?

With friends like you, Moore does not need enemies.

And you end it with the "nut case" comment. What I was trying to get you to see is why your statement did not make sense, even if you take it out of the context of sports and apply it to anything. I was trying to reach out and counsel you but you return my favor by insulting me.

Now I know "how you roll."

Hey chren i apologize if you take that as an insult.

Oh, why in the world would I take, as an insult,

"LOL now i know why people were pming me saying you were a nutcase...." ??????

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, why in the world would I take, as an insult,
>
> "LOL now i know why people were pming me saying
> you were a nutcase...." ??????


well thats what they said

Oh and you don't insult me by putting this on the board and by saying "now I know what they mean".

Like I said, SamSam, now I know how you roll.

I really would be a nutcase if I accepted your apology.

I defended you on this board more than anyone else has. This is how you respond when I disagree with you on one issue.

I was man enough to offer my apologies....If you are not man enough to accept it, its up to you.

Characterize it anyway you want.