Its nonsense to say Tannehill doesn't have a good deep ball. He has excellent accuracy deep, which is the #1 reason to pick a QB.

Tannehill's problems are that he isn't clutch, doesn't step things up in the red zone and the 4th qtr.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

DolfanQueen you are truly one ignorant dude.

DolfanKing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Tannehill's problems are that he isn't clutch,
> doesn't step things up in the red zone and the 4th
> qtr.


Hey i rather have tannehill than sanches or tbow.

Finshady Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DolfanQueen you are truly one ignorant dude.

DolfanKing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its nonsense to say Tannehill doesn't have a good
> deep ball. He has excellent accuracy deep, which
> is the #1 reason to pick a QB.
>
> Tannehill's problems are that he isn't clutch,
> doesn't step things up in the red zone and the 4th
> qtr.

****************************************************

Give him time, experience, and a good surrounding cast.

Panteraize Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DolfanKing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Its nonsense to say Tannehill doesn't have a
> good
> > deep ball. He has excellent accuracy deep,
> which
> > is the #1 reason to pick a QB.
>
> I commend you on FINALLY saying something
> unabashedly positive about Tannehill. You even got
> defensive about even the implication that
> Tannehill doesn't throw a good deep ball, and then
> used the word "excellent" to describe it. I'm
> shocked to hear an instance of you praising him,
> so props to you for that.
>
> But then, this...
>
>
> > Tannehill's problems are that he isn't clutch,
> > doesn't step things up in the red zone and the
> 4th
> > qtr.
>
> Tannehill isn't clutch? Isn't it a little
> premature for that kind of sweeping label? How
> many games has our rookie QB played in to warrant
> a declaration that he absolutely is not clutch?
> Period. End of sentence.
>



So far, no. His fourth qtr red zone performances were factors in both of our losses.

Not to say he won't get better, but he isn't there yet.


> It is way too premature to be able to declare
> definitively that our 24 year old, rookie QB with
> 6 NFL games under his belt is simply not "clutch".

Certainly some rookie QBs are "clutch" out of the gate. Tannehill's strength is his deep accuracy. But he has many weaknesses that many seem to overlook. He may get better, but that hasn't happened yet.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

DolfanKing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its nonsense to say Tannehill doesn't have a good
> deep ball. He has excellent accuracy deep, which
> is the #1 reason to pick a QB.
>
> Tannehill's problems are that he isn't clutch,
> doesn't step things up in the red zone and the 4th
> qtr.

You can't read. I said Russell Wilson deep ball was BETTER than Tannehill's. Aqua quoted it accurately above. Go back and try to read it again. I never said Tannehill has no deep ball at all. It's one of his best attributes. Just not as good as Russell Wilson's.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DolfanKing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Its nonsense to say Tannehill doesn't have a
> good
> > deep ball. He has excellent accuracy deep,
> which
> > is the #1 reason to pick a QB.
> >
> > Tannehill's problems are that he isn't clutch,
> > doesn't step things up in the red zone and the
> 4th
> > qtr.
>
> You can't read. I said Russell Wilson deep ball
> was BETTER than Tannehill's. Aqua quoted it
> accurately above. Go back and try to read it
> again. I never said Tannehill has no deep ball at
> all. It's one of his best attributes. Just not
> as good as Russell Wilson's.

You must hate Tannehill.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

Panteraize Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "hasn't happened yet" ?????? NOTHING has happened
> yet! He's played in six NFL games in his entire
> life! SIX!!!! A month and a half ago he was being
> fitted for a helmet! Jesus! He isn't clutch or
> categorically "not clutch" at this point. In the
> same way that he has yet to prove that he has that
> elite clutch gene, he has yet to prove that he
> does not. The sample size of his body of work is
> too small to make any kind of definitive statement
> about what he absolutely is not capable of. You're
> making the mistake of taking limited opportunity
> and the accompanying "yet-to-be-seen" as an
> inditement of "never will be".
>
> So yes, he has yet to show he possesses an elite
> level of clutchness. Just like he has yet to prove
> he can throw for 38 TD's and 4,000 yards in a
> season. But you won't find me making some
> ridiculous declaration of Tannehill's ineptitude
> based on that which has yet to occur. But like
> everyone on this board keeps telling you over and
> over, give him a chance to show that he's clutch.
> And instead of saying he's not before he's even
> really had a chance to demonstrate that he is, or
> develop enough to become clutch, be patient enough
> to watch him develop, see more opportunities for
> him to come through in the clutch, and wait to see
> if that characterization fits him and don't
> definitively label him as not being a clutch
> football player after he's played in exactly 6
> more NFL games than you and I have.


He has had chances and done nothing. Plenty of rookie QBs have cashed in on those chances. Tannehill hasn't. It could be that he's too young, or it could be that he just doesn't have what it takes. By the time we find out, it could be too late.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

You, Norton, are a mental case.

DK, you are so obviously a troll.

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DK, you are so obviously a troll.


Is he still posting the same stuff?

It amazes me that people would still engage him if he is.

The thing about internet trolls is they go away if you stop feeding them.

And Berk is the last person to call someone else a troll. So when Berk calls them a troll, they are.

So glad I blocked him. If everybody else did, he would go away.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DK, you are so obviously a troll.


Why?

I'm looking at this team. It is .500. We have a rookie QB that has proven nothing. We have a GM that proven time and time again that he will pick subpar talent. We have an owner that seems to give a squat about this team and its traditions.

Some of you seem to me like you think the current situation is great and wonderful.

Your bar has been lowered to the point where you will accept mediocre, and call anyone who wants more from the team a "troll".

You fail to realize that with this team, in its current state of management personell, it will be years before it does anything of note again.

Sorry, but I'm not a troll and I'll keep on posting.

------------------------------------------------------------

Miami Dolphins. Always Perfect.

Welcome back The Truth

dolphaholic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Welcome back The Truth

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

If that's the case then Andrew Luck has proven nothing as well and he is the first overall pick.

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

Yeah welcome back T................

Mike SHerman today in his PC- I think Matt Moores deep ball is one of his greatest assetts, he throws as good a deep ball as anyone..

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mike SHerman today in his PC- I think Matt Moores
> deep ball is one of his greatest assetts, he
> throws as good a deep ball as anyone..


He's right. It is one of his best assets. he was the only QB on our roster who could get the ball downfield last year without throwing a jumpball or missing the WR by 10 yards.

Tannehill's real good at it also. Always puts it in a place, at least so far, where either his WR gets it or nobody does.