Poll

Who does Ryan the man Tannehill looks more like?

Only registered users are allowed to vote for this poll.
5 votes were received.

Montanaesque	3		60%
Marinoish.	0		0%
Both	2		40%

---

Vote for who do you think Ryan The Man Tannehill looks more like....


Id say it a combination of both.


Either way.....We picked a stud QB in the draft.

1. We missed on manning...OVER THE HILL HE IS!
2. We missed on that scrub who got replaced by a rookie was it?
3. We did not draft the bust brady quinn.
4. We did not draft grandpa weeden....( some insane asylum people on another board wanted us to draft this kid ) THANK YOU GOD.
5. We didnt draft a qb last year. I wanted us to draft a qb last year because we needed one bigtime......

I think ladyluck has finnaly gotten a hold of this organization.

We have finnaly found the QB that will finnally replace the man DAN MARINO........YOU HEAR ME DOLPHANKING.....

GO PHINS.

I thought Ryan was Scotch-Irish?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/08/2012 09:30AM by BigNastyFish.

I say he looks Tannehillish.

or TanneHELLISH!

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

CAST YOUR VOTE AND MAKE DOLPHANKING EVEN MORE ANNOYED THAT THEE MAN TANNEHILL IS LOOKING LIKE A FREAKING SUPERSTAR.

We got our montamarinoish.....Now we get the next jerry rice in the draft next year.

What a COMBO.

DOLPHANKING IS in a coffe break....

Now llook at my tagline again!

IM PHONE FIX IT A BIT.

First, we shouldn't jinx him by having such a poll so early in his career.

I assume what you mean is if the good things about him continue and grow and the bad things, such as lack of ball security when the ball is in his hands, disappear what does his skill set remind you of.

Neither. He is more like John Elway. Neither Montana nor Marino was known for mobility which is one of RT's chief assets.

I would vote "neither" if it was a choice just as I would if I were to vote for the president.

Hooligan2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I would vote "neither" if it was a choice just as
> I would if I were to vote for the president.


I agree to Both!

You believe in jinxes chren?

I do not.


tannehill is what he is and its not going to change.

I would hope that that means you guys are Centrists like me but "I don't think soooooo" like that comedian used to say in the Sixties.

I hope not SamSam. If he is this good this early and we get some REAL wide receivers (we just need something like the Marks brothers like Marino had, we don't even need Nat Moore and Paul Warfield like Griese had) then he can be historic.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hope not SamSam. If he is this good this early
> and we get some REAL wide receivers (we just need
> something like the Marks brothers like Marino had,
> we don't even need Nat Moore and Paul Warfield
> like Griese had) then he can be historic.


Chren if he can make the receivers that we have look good.....Imagine him with a couple of star receivers..

The sky is the limit bro.

IMO he is making the receivers way better than what they are.

Coincidence that hartline is having breakthrough season?

He wasnt as good before and hes had his chances.

this poll is funnny

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

I only hope DK votes for one. please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I should had added sanchesiz or tebowish to the mix as well.

Neither, the offense he plays in and his ability to roll out and throw on the run reminds me more of A. Rodgers (not saying he's as good as Rodgers or anything), only time will tell if he gets there.