This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
I dont know about "worst", but it is looking like a rather unremarkable group. I think we will end up with a bunch of sure handed recievers who aren't very flashy. It could be worse.
It would be nice if there was a "burner" either on the roster or available in FA.
thing is, WR should be one of the easiest positions to fill in the draft. If we can add a #1 next year, our group suddenly becomes pretty good. We are filled with solid #2 and #3 types, just lack a difference maker (and no I am not losing sleep over BMarshall's trade)
________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> thing is, WR should be one of the easiest
> positions to fill in the draft. If we can add a #1
> next year, our group suddenly becomes pretty good.
> We are filled with solid #2 and #3 types, just
> lack a difference maker (and no I am not losing
> sleep over BMarshall's trade)
Maybe one of them will develop into a deep threat.
sconigli Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont know about "worst", but it is looking like
> a rather unremarkable group. I think we will end
> up with a bunch of sure handed recievers who
> aren't very flashy. It could be worse.
>
> It would be nice if there was a "burner" either on
> the roster or available in FA.
Chris Chambers said that he thinks Cunningham will be a good pro. He watched him live against Wisconsin and was worried about what he was doing against his Baggers. While none of us will be thrilled to hear that Charles Davis compared him to Patrick Turner,it was nice that his former college coach likened him to Muhsin Muhhamed.
As for Matthews, I recall Gil Brandt projecting as a 2nd rounder because he wowed the scouts at his pro day. He seems impressive enough to me on the videos.
I think Ireland really liked both of them and was surprised to see them there so late. He suggested that they may have not been the fastest players, but the were football players and they played fast.
Nobody knows for sure how it will work out, but I am just saying not to count them out.
Jonathan Twilley Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ChyrenB Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh, that was a wicked one, stevie. LOL.
>
>
> What was so wicked? Did you think he was talking
> about Matt Moore?
Oops. Yes. I was wrong. I thought he was joining in on the fun.
berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok after looking at those highlights someone tell
> me how matthews went in the 7th?
He sprained his MCL in the last game of the year. And then he reaggravated it right before the combine. It led to a poor showing, running a 4.62, and not being able to cut well on his routes. Probably because of that, only about 15 teams went to his pro day. But, there, he ran a 4.44 and very crisp routes.
dolphaholic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Guys please lets just leave tannehill as a
> > QB......Its hard enough transition to make it
> in
> > the NFL in one position.
> >
> >
> > What makes you believe he is going to make it at
> 2
> > positions.
> >
> > you guys are dreaming too much. It would be
> great
> > if he makes it at QB....
> >
> > that would be enough for me.
> >
> > Stop dreaming yall.
>
>
> Shouldn't that be singular and not plural?
Well that goes for all that want tannehill as the next deion sanders...
that goes for present and future...Whoever thats crazy enough so say tannehill will be a double threat.
dolphaholic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Guys please lets just leave tannehill as a
> > QB......Its hard enough transition to make it
> in
> > the NFL in one position.
> >
> >
> > What makes you believe he is going to make it at
> 2
> > positions.
> >
> > you guys are dreaming too much. It would be
> great
> > if he makes it at QB....
> >
> > that would be enough for me.
> >
> > Stop dreaming yall.
>
>
> Shouldn't that be singular and not plural?
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Sam,
What Mark is saying, is that there is only 1 person on this board who even thinks Tannehill will line up at WR.