Peter King said Garrard looked better then Manning
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Kind of interesting, King, said, that he saw one day of practice of Manning and one day of practice of Garrard, and Garrard looked better then Manning... He was later asked if what he said was an indictment on Manning or praise of Garrard. He responded that Garrard had a really good practice while King was in Miami...
Garrard the better signing then Manning.... is it possible?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche
Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kind of interesting, King, said, that he saw one
> day of practice of Manning and one day of practice
> of Garrard, and Garrard looked better then
> Manning... He was later asked if what he said was
> an indictment on Manning or praise of Garrard. He
> responded that Garrard had a really good practice
> while King was in Miami...
>
> Garrard the better signing then Manning.... is it
> possible?
Of course its possible. For the last four years in a row that both were active (both sat out last season) Gerrard has had a better passer rating than Manning.
Gerrard is two years younger than Manning.
Gerrard's injury (herniated disk) was far less serious than Manning's.
Gerrard was also available at half the price.
That he wasn't #1 on the Dolphins Rolodex, that the Dolphins seriously considered Manning and Flynn ahead of Gerrard, shows how backwards the FO is in evaluating talent.
I find it hysterical that some fans actually think that a rookie who has limited reps in college would actually start over Gerrard.
We can expect Gerrard to be the starter this year and he is a big reason we shouldn't expect Tannehill to start until next year - at the earliest.
The thing about it is that unlike Denver (I'm being sarcastic), the rest of us mere mortals don't know now, and certainly didn't know at the time Denver signed him, how Peyton would come back from the injury and the year lay off and all.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/04/2012 09:24PM by ChyrenB.
I want manning to fail almost as much as i want the Dolphins to Succeed. I really was turned off by the way he handled the off season and his team choice. Plus I can't stand Elway and his horse teeth. The way he treated Tbow was deplorable.
Treasure, I want him to fail because I want Denver to look stupid for being sucker enough to take an old guy who was injured so much in his last season that he couldn't even suit up and I didn't know it was Manning that treated Tebow bad, I thought it was Denver.
Too funny, one so called "expert" says Garrard had one better practice then Manning, and our resident tool uses that to indicte the FO. Not to mention, if Kings assesment turns out to be right, Ireland should be praised for getting Garrard at a bargain and not over-paying for Manning or Flynn.
Whenever you want to switch back to your original name so we can all put your nonsense into perspective....feel free "the Dolfanking"
Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kind of interesting, King, said, that he saw one
> day of practice of Manning and one day of practice
> of Garrard, and Garrard looked better then
> Manning... He was later asked if what he said was
> an indictment on Manning or praise of Garrard. He
> responded that Garrard had a really good practice
> while King was in Miami...
>
> Garrard the better signing then Manning.... is it
> possible?
To answer your question, NO. And KING is a dumb, opinionated douchebag.
GARRARD is mostly hype by the same liberal press that hoped that McNABB would be an elite QB. And for the same reasons. But GARRARD's a decent-to-mediocre QB on his best day, and now, he has a chronic back issue.
The remarks by KING are rendered even more stupid by said back issue. I myself don't trust back injuries. I still remember D GARDNER before and after.
LUDUPORCU Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> GARRARD is mostly hype by the same liberal press
> that hoped that McNABB would be an elite QB. And
> for the same reasons.
DolfanKing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LUDUPORCU Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > GARRARD is mostly hype by the same liberal
> press
> > that hoped that McNABB would be an elite QB.
> And
> > for the same reasons.
>
> Racist.
No, HONEST...and right. Try honesty sometime, fool.
LUDUPORCU Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DolfanKing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LUDUPORCU Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > GARRARD is mostly hype by the same liberal
> > press
> > > that hoped that McNABB would be an elite QB.
> > And
> > > for the same reasons.
> >
> > Racist.
>
>
> No, HONEST...and right. Try honesty sometime,
> fool.
Please. Nothing honest about that.
First, exactly what hype is Gerrard getting? Peter King?
Are you're saying that Peter King is a liar? Have you been to both training camps and seen that King was lying, or does it kill you that a black man can be a QB?