samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think we should just go with the best player
> available. And tannehill is not the best player
> available.
>
> We should draft the best player available with
> every pick this year until next year when we can
> draft a highly ranked QB prospect.


But who's to say one of next years qb's will be the highest rated qb on your board when we pick next year?

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mizzou15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > THE Truth Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > mizzou15 Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > I will let you in on a secret truth. I
> never
> > > said
> > > > I think Tannehill is worthy of the #8 pick.
> I
> > > said
> > > > I do not mind if the team picked him.
> > >
> > >
> > > Haha! Nice try.
> > >
> > > That's like saying "I'm not saying that girl
> is
> > > attractive, but wouldn't mind doing her."
> >
> >
> > I could not have put it better. Exactly what I
> am
> > saying.
>
>
> Yes but that means you think I unattractive
> players are worthy of high draft picks also...
>
> Or if you prefer, any pig will do at. Losing
> time.
>
> Either way, it sort of removes you from the
> conversation since you'll take anyone in that
> spot...doesn't it?

No it does not you are reading but not comprehending or just stick to straight football and drop your metaphors since you put so much weight on that side of the scale. I have always said I do not mind if we pick Tannehill at 8. I have always said that Tannehill is not my personal choice. THe G from Stanford, DeCastro is. I also like the DE from S. C. Personally I think the 8 spot is too much of a reach for Tannehill and do not want to give up draft picks to get him.

mizzou15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> No it does not you are reading but not
> comprehending or just stick to straight football
> and drop your metaphors since you put so much
> weight on that side of the scale. I have always
> said I do not mind if we pick Tannehill at 8. I
> have always said that Tannehill is not my personal
> choice. THe G from Stanford, DeCastro is. I also
> like the DE from S. C. Personally I think the 8
> spot is too much of a reach for Tannehill and do
> not want to give up draft picks to get him.

That was obvious to me and everyone else on the first reading, Mizzou.

But you are dealing with someone who believes that if you want something, there is no price TOO BIG for you to pay.

That is precisely why...........................

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think we should just go with the best player
> > available. And tannehill is not the best player
> > available.
> >
> > We should draft the best player available with
> > every pick this year until next year when we
> can
> > draft a highly ranked QB prospect.
>
>
> But who's to say one of next years qb's will be
> the highest rated qb on your board when we pick
> next year?

As much as i hate to say it i think we are not going to be very good next year truth.......................IMHO we are going to pick even higher next year. And this is painfull to say.

3 relevant "Truth" quotes for your considerations. Especially useful in a forum environment.

1. There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; not going all the way, and not starting.
Buddha

2. In a controversy the instant we feel anger we have already ceased striving for the truth, and have begun striving for ourselves.
Buddha

3. Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
Winston Churchill

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/16/2012 11:47AM by samsam3738.

And not a damn one of the three have to do with OUR "THE Truth."

mizzou15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I do not mind grabbing Tannehil at #8 but do not
> want to trade anything to move up. We need those
> two 3rd rnd picks. Should we miss out on Tannehill
> at #8 we still can grab a very good player at #8.
> We draft another qb in rnd 2 then still have the
> two 3rd rnd picks. That gives us 4 of the top 50
> players in the draft.

*******************************************************

How about trading back a few spots? Then Miami will have 5 picks in the top 50.

mizzou15 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> THE Truth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > mizzou15 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > THE Truth Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > mizzou15 Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > I will let you in on a secret truth. I
> > never
> > > > said
> > > > > I think Tannehill is worthy of the #8
> pick.
> > I
> > > > said
> > > > > I do not mind if the team picked him.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Haha! Nice try.
> > > >
> > > > That's like saying "I'm not saying that
> girl
> > is
> > > > attractive, but wouldn't mind doing her."
> > >
> > >
> > > I could not have put it better. Exactly what
> I
> > am
> > > saying.
> >
> >
> > Yes but that means you think I unattractive
> > players are worthy of high draft picks also...
> >
> > Or if you prefer, any pig will do at. Losing
> > time.
> >
> > Either way, it sort of removes you from the
> > conversation since you'll take anyone in that
> > spot...doesn't it?
>
> No it does not you are reading but not
> comprehending or just stick to straight football
> and drop your metaphors since you put so much
> weight on that side of the scale. I have always
> said I do not mind if we pick Tannehill at 8. I
> have always said that Tannehill is not my personal
> choice. THe G from Stanford, DeCastro is. I also
> like the DE from S. C. Personally I think the 8
> spot is too much of a reach for Tannehill and do
> not want to give up draft picks to get him.

**************************************************

Chyren, Miami will not draft an inside offensive lineman (DeCastro) with their 8th pick. If they trade back and he is there, then they could possibly get him.

That was THE Truth that mentioned DeCastro, Captkoi, but You're right. I like him too.

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think we should just go with the best player
> available. And tannehill is not the best player
> available.
>
> We should draft the best player available with
> every pick this year until next year when we can
> draft a highly ranked QB prospect.
>
> But you can bet on it........they will reach like
> always because the dolphins scouts have sucked for
> the last 25 years.

***********************************************************

The only problem I see with that, Sam, is that at 8, the "best" players are no longer available. Granted, there will be some really good players there, but not "best" players.

As for Tanney, look at it this way. The best players are gone, so the remaining "best" player at a position that Miami needs (and could be a franchise guy) would be the QB they haven't had since Danny boy, and that would be Tanney.

If they go another way, so be it. But Miami has to fix that QB position and they may never be in another position to grab a possible franchise guy.

captkoi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mizzou15 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I do not mind grabbing Tannehil at #8 but do
> not
> > want to trade anything to move up. We need
> those
> > two 3rd rnd picks. Should we miss out on
> Tannehill
> > at #8 we still can grab a very good player at
> #8.
> > We draft another qb in rnd 2 then still have
> the
> > two 3rd rnd picks. That gives us 4 of the top
> 50
> > players in the draft.
>
> **************************************************
> *****
>
> How about trading back a few spots? Then Miami
> will have 5 picks in the top 50.


You two might wanna re-do the math, as it stands right now, we don't have 4 picks in the top 50.

while we are fighting over the scraps of the draft at 8 let's all remember those wonderous wins over the likes of buff and was etc at the end of the year that so many on here wanted more than life itself. we'd be looking at a different caliber of player (or a means to a trade up for RG3) without those

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

“Fight for your opinions, but do not believe that they contain the whole truth or the only truth.”
Charles Anderson Dana Quotes, Topic: Opinions

You ought to make that your "signature" Hooligan.

omar kelly is a moron. but he is correct on that point

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Omar is an idiot. BUt yes, he is right.

I also follow him. Most of his tweets are asinine and half the guys on this board could do a better job of following the Dolphins than he does.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

not just an idiot but also an insufferable humorless jerk. a bad combo.

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

berkeley I am beginning to think that you and a few others here are insufferable humorless old men. I think Omar is one of the few S Fl sporswriters that have a clue. Definately better than anythone at the Herald minus Ed Pope and the Sentinal.

hey I'm not that old
"Ed Pope"? are you kidding? that guy is 105 years old and hasn't written a coherent article since the 1980s

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.