 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| -- Advertisement -- |
 |
Phins.com Phorums |  | ||||||||
 |
News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links |  |
||||||||
|
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :
Phins.com Phorums
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
(R/J)ay
()
Date: March 21, 2012 09:49AM Comparing Brandon Weeden to John Beck is just stupid.
Their similarities begin and end with the fact that both will have been drafted at age 28. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
ChyrenB
()
Date: March 21, 2012 10:05AM Yeah, RJay. I wondered at that point myself. It's like recounting what John Dillinger did at age 28 and then projecting that JFK would probably be doing the same thing at age 28. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
DaytonaDolfan13
()
Date: March 21, 2012 11:00AM NICK FOLES is a good option in the late 3rd or 4th, if we havent already addressed the need.
**Weather certainly played a part in a poor showing, it was hailing and windy rain at his PRO-DAY. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
(R/J)ay
()
Date: March 21, 2012 11:15AM I dunno, I read that at least one scout described Foles' pro day as "completely embarrassing" even considering the weather.
He could still be our target but my guess is we're taking Tannehill at 8. I don't see Cleveland taking him at 4, no way. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: March 21, 2012 12:51PM Tannehill or Barkley is the only option. Only option. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
dolfanmark
()
Date: March 21, 2012 01:03PM Miami Reppa Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > we drafted a 28 year old before remember... his > name was john beck, how did he work out? John Beck was 25 when we drafted him. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: March 21, 2012 01:22PM But he was 26 when the season started. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
(R/J)ay
()
Date: March 21, 2012 02:05PM John Beck wasn't half the QB that Brandon Weeden is. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: March 21, 2012 02:30PM Yes. And Brandon Weeden will be 29 shortly after the season starts.
Thats old as George Burns balls in terms of rookies. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
THE Truth
()
Date: March 21, 2012 02:49PM Aqua&Orange Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Yes. And Brandon Weeden will be 29 shortly after > the season starts. > > Thats old as George Burns balls in terms of > rookies. True, but so what? If he plays for 5 or 6 years you have plenty of time to groom his successor. Wheedon is a stud. As many have said, if he were 22 or 23 he'd be in the discussion with Luck and RG3 at the top of the draft. But he's 28 and STILL a late 1st or early 2nd projection. I'm pretty sure that the Dallas Cowboys have no regrets about Roger Staubach being a 27 year old rookie. If you can play, you can play. Your age shouldn't disqualify you. Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: March 21, 2012 02:57PM Hey, I never said anything negative about the guy other than him being an crusty old rookie.
Calm down, big'un. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
DepressedDolFan13
()
Date: March 21, 2012 04:23PM No way Tannehill #8!!! Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: March 21, 2012 04:46PM Go tell Gil Brandt that. He has pooped out more football knowledge than all of us combined know. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
ChyrenB
()
Date: March 21, 2012 04:53PM TT is right. We were willing to take Peyton Manning at 37. So why should we be afraid to take what could turn out to be Peyton Manning at 27 with 10 years ahead of him? Re: Tannehill at no. 8 or Weeden AFTER no. 8
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: March 21, 2012 05:00PM I'm not afraid of Weedon if Philbin and Sherman think he is the answer.
I'm only afraid of drafting someone they draft that they think is not the answer. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
