Home
THIS SITE
  About Phins.com
  Contact Us
TEAM NEWS
  Team Info
  Twitter Feeds
  News Wire
  Phins RSS Feed
GAMES
  Schedule
PERSONNEL
  Roster
  Depth Chart
FOR THE FANS
  Forums
  Places To Watch
HISTORY
  Team History
  1972 Tribute
 
-- Advertisement --
Privacy Policy at Phins.com
 
  Phins.com Phorums
    News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links  
          JAKE LOCKER
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :  Phins.com Phorums The fastest message board... ever.
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel
JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: Alpha Phin ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:04AM

Could the real reason Miami is waiting for Manning be that they are actually interested in a trade for Jake Locker,if Manning signs with the Titans?

I thought I read last year that Ireland was really high on Locker and now he may be able to get his quarterback. This would allow the Titans to surround Manning with more help thru the draft which also leads me to think if Manning is signed and plays 3-4 more years that would put Locker at the end of this 4 year contract, so why not get something for him now. I also really doubt he would like to sit behind Manning for the next 3 years.

Miami would in turn find there quarterback of the future who Philbin could build his offense around.

Just a thought.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: dolfanmark ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:05AM

Not likely.

The West Coast Offense demands excellent footwork and precise accuracy. Both of those are Locker weaknesses.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: dolphaholic ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:05AM

Alpha Phin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Could the real reason Miami is waiting for Manning
> be that they are actually interested in a trade
> for Jake Locker,if Manning signs with the Titans?
>
> I thought I read last year that Ireland was
> really high on Locker and now he may be able to
> get his quarterback. This would allow the Titans
> to surround Manning with more help thru the draft
> which also leads me to think if Manning is signed
> and plays 3-4 more years that would put Locker at
> the end of this 4 year contract, so why not get
> something for him now. I also really doubt he
> would like to sit behind Manning for the next 3
> years.
>
> Miami would in turn find there quarterback of the
> future who Philbin could build his offense around.
>
>
> Just a thought.


Would we have to give up the #8 for him???????? No thanks if so.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: Aqua&Orange ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:07AM

Locker is a career (including college) 50% passer.

That is Tim Tebow land.

The WCO, as Mark said, *REQUIRES* accuracy.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: dolfanmark ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:14AM

You can't stress that enough. When Mike Sherman was asked what he looks for in a QB, the first thing he said is footwork. The WCO is all about timing. Sherman times the QBs on their 1, 3, 5, and 7 step drops. They always have to be the same. Much of the offense is almost "robotic." It's 3 or 5 step drop, plant, throw to a spot, and the receiver better be where he is supposed to. There is not a lot of dropping back, surveying around, waiting for a guy to come open. It's bang, bang, bang. And it really demands consistent footwork, quick decisions, and VERY accurate passing.

When you think about what that means, you realize why Matt Moore is a poor fit (sloppy footwork, slow decision making, and accuracy that comes and goes) and why Brandon Marshall wasn't a great fit (runs routes the way he wants to, not how they are drawn up).

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: Alpha Phin ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:18AM

I agree with everyone on the accuracy I'm basing this on Ireland and how he feels about Locker.

I guess I just can't figure out what they are waiting for when it comes to upgrading the quaterback position. They have to know Manning is not coming to Miami. I just have a feeling something else is in play?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: Aqua&Orange ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:30AM

Im telling you,

They are waiting on Matt Barkley. grinning smiley

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: DaytonaDolfan13 ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:57AM

Aqua&Orange Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Im telling you,
>
> They are waiting on Matt Barkley. grinning smiley


LOL. drinking smiley

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: JAKE LOCKER
Posted by: berkeley223 ()
Date: March 15, 2012 11:58AM

locker isn't very good. he'd cost our 1st round pick anyway, since they aren't trading the #10 pick last year for anything less than a 1st. Finally, why would they dump locker (their "QB of the future"winking smiley after signing Manning, who has got only a few yrs left anyway?

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
Home Curt Fennell
Contact Us
DOLFAN in New England
TOP
   
© Phins.com. No portion of this site may be reproduced without
the express permission of the author, Curt Fennell. All rights reserved.