What about Matt Flynn makes a lot of the people on this board think he is the next Andrew Luck?

What has he done to prove he is as good as, let alone better, than Matt Moore?

I never said he was anything.

Matter of fact, I have no clue what he will be.

But I do know this, alot of times...systems make players. And if history is any clue, we can atleast all agree that Flynn really, really excelled in that offense.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

First of all, I didn't know what WAS your position, A & O. I have heard a lot of people on this board advocating bring in the coach and he'll bring Matt Flynn with him.

I looked over his stats and here they are. Pay particular attention to the number of opportunities he had to play..............................

Recent Games
WK OPP RESULT Passing Rushing Fumbles Comp Att Pct Yds Avg TD Int Sck SckY Rate Att Yds Avg TD FUM Lost
15 @KC L 14-19 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

16 CHI W 35-21 0 0 -- 0 -- 0 0 1 1 0.0 2 -2 -1.0 0 -- --

17 DET W 45-41 31 44 70.5 480 10.9 6 1 3 11 136.4 2 0 0.0 0 1 1


Career Stats more
G GS Comp Att Pct Yds Avg TD Int Sck SckY Rate Att Yds Avg TD FUM Lost
2011 5 1 33 49 67.3 518 10.6 6 2 5 18 124.8 13 -6 -0.5 1 1 1

2010 7 1 40 66 60.6 433 6.6 3 2 7 38 82.4 9 26 2.9 0 1 1

2009 15 0 7 12 58.3 58 4.8 0 1 1 6 36.1 5 -5 -1.0 0 -- --

2008 7 0 2 5 40.0 6 1.2 0 0 0 0 47.9 4 4 1.0 0 1 0

TOTAL 82 132 62.1 1,015 7.7 9 5 13 62 92.8 31 19 0.6 1 3



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/18/2012 06:14PM by ChyrenB.

Chyren,

That is very hard to follow, bud. Just letting you know.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

LOL. I know but I'm no computer geek. I think I got it from NFL.com though.

These figures confirm he will be the next Tom Brady!

In reality his NFl games at least show some NFL ability, something Luck & griffin cannot. He could be a Romo or a Cassell or Kolb

Who Knows

Chyrene you gotta excuse A&O apparently he knows everything and we don't. Aqua maybe you should be the next coach? you seem to have all the answers. you da man bro..........

Dont know what your problem is, Treasure. I said nothing negative about this.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

I didn't take it badly.

For that matter, what makes anyone think Luck will be the next Matt Flynn and produce game stats like this:

31 out of 44
480 yards
6-TD’s 1-INT
QB rating: 136.4

It’s a good chance Luck will never duplicate those stats in his career. LOL.

Thanks, bud.

Cuz I really meant no ill will.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

BNF, was that the Detroit game. The last game of the season. The game where well neither the Lions nor the Packers had much at stake.

I say don't discount performance...

The bullets were live and it was a real game. And if you remember, Flynn was nothing but a winner in college as well.

He has to be as good of a "prospect" as Luck, who hasn't thrown a pass in the league, and has significant questions regarding his arm. My opinion of course. But the kid shows game every chance he gets, what else can he do?

The answer is - he needs his own gig at this point, and I for one would welcome him to my yammie with open arms...

I would only be interested in Flynn if Philbin is hired as HC. It would be much easier to keep him in the same system, even if it means getting rid of Daboll, who did a great job this year.

Not sue why people are going crazy over a guy who has not throw 150 passes in the NFL. He had one good game against a weak Detroit secondary and folks are screaming for him. He was not special at LSU. I would rather have a guy who has started in the NFL backing or pushing Moore. Rex Grossman or Jason Campbell.

Mizzou, I was going to respond to BNF but he actually is implying that if we could a) draft Andrew Luck or b) get Matt Flynn in a trade, he would take option b).

That is fantastic. Sure Peyton Manning had never played a down of pro football out of college. Sure John Elway had never played a down of pro football out of college. But to choose a second stringer over the top prospect out of the draft is well.......but half the time BNF is really putting people on and sh_tting on their cornflakes.

Not the point, and you know it... The point is:

we have the possibility to get Flynn for ZERO draft cache.

To get Lucky boy we'd have to trade our entire draft plus + plus.

That's the fact to consider when you ponder the options and discount the fact Lucky boy has yet to complete a pass in the NFL.

>>> My opinion, of course...

I can clue you in....

It was Colonel Mustard, in the den, with the candlestick.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

Okay. Now I see what you are getting at.

BTW, I see what BNF was getting at not A & O's comment which zipped in between our two posts.

I think too many around here are in love with the unknown, thus the allure of strange...



Beyond that, a lot of you mavens will have some serious backpedaling to do if RGIII can't walk on water...

I think Kiper makes my case rather well BTW. It's the more responsible path, and leads to certain improvement as opposed to a rather reckless handling of our draft potentials.

But YEA, I hear you.

Do it NOW. And shut up.

BNF.