If we lose out on Griffin I could live with use landing the following 3 players

Ryan Tannehill
Dwayne Allen
Jeff Fuller


Adding Allen and Fuller to marshall and a quick receiver like gates could really add some offensive weapons

If we lose out on Griffin and Luck, then draft Coby Fleener. He'll be an all-pro.

why do you guys like the players you have mentioned?

i have doubts on tannehill being a one year starter.

i like adding allen or fleener. another solid TE will only help this team.

i don't know much about Fuller but i would rather get McNutt from Iowa, he is the real deal

The reason I like Fleener is that he makes circus catches in the endzone that Randy Moss would envy.

He is Andrew Luck's number 1 receiver and some say is what makes Luck look so good.

You can add 19 recievers........does not mean squat if you don't have someone throwing them the ball. We need to move up and grab Luck or Griffin if we have a willing Partner. Failure to do so is not an option.

tannehill is a very good pocket passer. I like his accuracy...

Luck and Griffin are not the only two QB's in the draft that can help the Phins get better. There are others, and one or two that we haven't even considered. However that said, we have to put them into the right system and add the right players around them to make good things happen. There is quite a lot of luck involved and that luck isn't the QB.

Face it fella's, if we get a "smart" coach the starting QB for next year will be Matt Moore. And this is true even if we do draft Luck or Griffin. Beyond 2012 all bets should be off as to who the starter should be.

Tannehill had problems in big games. Crunch time situations.


That is a very big red flag for me (smells of Matt Moore and Chad Henne).

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

i think there should be an open competition for QB in camp no matter who we get. moore should not be penciled in nor should ANY rookie we get.

dolphin1423 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think there should be an open competition for QB
> in camp no matter who we get. moore should not be
> penciled in nor should ANY rookie we get.


RE: Agreed completely...

Ken Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolphin1423 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > i think there should be an open competition for
> QB
> > in camp no matter who we get. moore should not
> be
> > penciled in nor should ANY rookie we get.
>
>
> RE: Agreed completely...

Unless we draft andrew luck.

no samsam. no exceptions but i'm fairly sure that Luck would beat out Moore.

i have no problem with an open competition, as long as the competition is with moore and someone who objectively should end up being better than moore

berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i have no problem with an open competition, as
> long as the competition is with moore and someone
> who objectively should end up being better than
> moore


What if, Objectively speaking, Moore wins that competition? Would you be cool with that? I would.

yes, of course.

An open competition between Matt Moore and anybody other than a full-fledge reh-tard would prove, well....nevermind.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"