 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| -- Advertisement -- |
 |
Phins.com Phorums |  | ||||||||
 |
News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links |  |
||||||||
|
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :
Phins.com Phorums
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
Doug-THE-Dolfan
()
Date: December 08, 2008 02:21PM IF they are placing teams with identical records in alphabetical order they have failed in the NFC south. They have Tampa above Carolina. Tampa beat Carolina in their only head to head (they play this comming weekend I believe), but it is inconsistent what they are doing. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
montequi
()
Date: December 08, 2008 02:23PM Must be the new NFL rule. If you're NE you automatically win any tiebreaker. Goodell will next be petitioning for a new rule that allows NE to win games without actually playing. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
montequi
()
Date: December 08, 2008 02:24PM Doug-THE-Dolfan Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > IF they are placing teams with identical records > in alphabetical order they have failed in the NFC > south. They have Tampa above Carolina. Tampa beat > Carolina in their only head to head (they play > this comming weekend I believe), but it is > inconsistent what they are doing. It's probably based on the result of the latest head-to-head. At least the web site programmers aren't deciding who makes the playoffs! Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
Doug-THE-Dolfan
()
Date: December 08, 2008 03:16PM After looking at it I think they place teams with the same records in the order of total point difference. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
dres9711
()
Date: December 08, 2008 04:04PM Doug-THE-Dolfan Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > After looking at it I think they place teams with > the same records in the order of total point > difference. Thats wrong also, if you reconfigure it and sort it by conference they have the colts ahead of the Ravens and the pats are still ahead of us. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
samsam3738
()
Date: December 09, 2008 03:57AM I'm about as sick of the pats and jets as any of you are. Especially the pats. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
samsam3738
()
Date: December 09, 2008 04:00AM One thing................I really love the buffalo bills this year. Yes i do.
Just this year. LOL GOOOOOOOOOOO BILLS......  Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/09/2008 04:01AM by samsam3738. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
psalm462
()
Date: December 09, 2008 05:39AM I prefer it listed like that because it makes it look like the under dog and it wont get their heads up too high. It is simple. Play out winning and we host. Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
Doug-THE-Dolfan
()
Date: December 11, 2008 02:09PM From dres9711:
"Thats wrong also, if you reconfigure it and sort it by conference they have the colts ahead of the Ravens and the pats are still ahead of us." Uh... I'm not sure what you mean, but the way they list the teams with tied records with in one division is in the order of "Net points" which is the difference between "points for" and "points against". However, if you differentiate as you intergrate you will disintergrate.  Re: NFL.COM Standings
Posted by:
Doug
()
Date: December 12, 2008 01:01PM Doug-THE-Dolfan Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > > However, if you differentiate as you intergrate > you will disintergrate. Who knew that Walt "Clyde" Frazier was a Dolphin fan... LOLOLOLOLOL !!! "I don't really care what happened in the past, I'm not afraid of challenges. I look forward to them." - T. Sparano Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
