Well, we all see the shine in pouncey and his ability, the guy is strong and can seriously move for a guy 6'5 300...But he has continuosly wiffed big blocks when he is out there running free.. I think to solve this in the interim these RB's need to get behind Pouncey when he is at the next level, the problem is getting the RB's to know what Pouncey is gonna do and Pouncey what the RB is gonna do becasue he hasnt figure out how to connect as good as need be yet. If the Runner just tucks in behind him, he will destroy whatever is in front of them... Let the runner draw the tackler into Pouncey rather then Pouncey chasing the tackler in open space and wiffing at a quicker guy...

Yeah you are right PF2, that is exactly what I was saying that we should cut Pouncey, and sign Berger or Grove.... Cant people have an ratonal discussion about a player and how things are going or what would work better... My point was instead of putting the extra pressure to connect on his own which has taken him off his feet and out of a few plays, if he just stayed on his feet, and put the decision and adjustment on the runner rather then Pouncey... He has alot going on and is beast, but I believe this would drastically help him and his play... Sorry I didnt realize, we cant bring up any notes on watching tape... Surely the organization is just looking at it like rosey glasees and patting themselves on the back....lol....

I would love to hear they start having POuncey go to RB meetings..but since this is his second game i wont cross my fingers yet. I expect to hear it about the 10th week tho

Now after giving that time to sink in and posting this for the rest of the people whose intelligence it will not go over (although I'm certain it will zip by yours).....when you complained about people moaning about players we "cut," I did not take it literally because I am not a pedestrian minded person, although I should have realized that you are and should have known that you were talking literally, in fact, autistically.

I thought you were using "cut" as an overall designation for people we have let go, traded, not tendered a big enough offer to, etc.

That is why I immediately posted LAMBASTING the administration for not keeping Welker and Ginn, who were traded, as well as Will Allen, who was cut.

BTW, I never defended Crowder. Not because I thought he was bad, but because I thought it was more of an injury thing.

But this is beside the point. You're a kool-aid drinker and a militant kool-aid drinker.

Whether its trade or not matching offers, you would defend this AND EVERY administration to the hilt.

So it really doesn't matter that you got me wrong on Pouncey.

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
I am not a pedestrian minded person, although I should have realized that you are and should have known that you were talking
literally, in fact, autistically.


Excuse my ignorance, but what exactly is "talking autistically" supposed to mean?

For those of us who have an autistic family member (in my case, my 11 yr old son), what exactly do you mean by that remark? I find the use of the term to demean or insult a member of this forum offensive.