Home
THIS SITE
  About Phins.com
  Contact Us
TEAM NEWS
  Team Info
  Twitter Feeds
  News Wire
  Phins RSS Feed
GAMES
  Schedule
PERSONNEL
  Roster
  Depth Chart
FOR THE FANS
  Forums
  Places To Watch
HISTORY
  Team History
  1972 Tribute
 
-- Advertisement --
Privacy Policy at Phins.com
 
  Phins.com Phorums
    News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links  
          Which is better?
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :  Phins.com Phorums The fastest message board... ever.
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel
Which is better?
Posted by: Phinsfan2 ()
Date: September 19, 2009 02:04PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Which is better?
Posted by: berkeley223 ()
Date: September 19, 2009 03:10PM

#2
any outcome where wanny has anything to do with this team is horrible.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Which is better?
Posted by: montequi ()
Date: September 19, 2009 05:02PM

#1 would have been different. We'd have drafted Brees, but Wanny would have played Fiedler over him in his first season. The Brees would have come in in his 2nd year when Fiedler got hurt and been sacked a ton of times. I think it's inevitable Wanny would get canned, but not before Brees is either traded or allowed to become a UFA and sign with someone else.

#2 would have been different as well, because I don't think Saban would have stuck around regardless of how well the team played.

Either way we'd have a different coach and GM, but with #2 we'd be more likely to still have Brees today.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Which is better?
Posted by: samsam3738 ()
Date: September 20, 2009 12:01PM

wanny picks eddy moore instead of boldin and saban trades for culpepper instead of drafting brees. No wonder they are back in college.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Which is better?
Posted by: MikeO ()
Date: September 20, 2009 01:31PM

well its not #3.........cause in the other 2 scenerios we end up with a franchise QB one way or another

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Which is better?
Posted by: Phinjim ()
Date: September 21, 2009 05:09AM

I''ll throw in Option # 4

Where we get Brees in either option 1 or 2, but the caoching changes happen anyway, because we still would have had squat for a team around him, and he might have healed from all the bruses he would have gotten playing before we got the current regime and the #1 pick.

No QB including peyton mannign could have pulled this team out without a re-build of the OL and youth at defense secondary.

Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
Home Curt Fennell
Contact Us
DOLFAN in New England
TOP
   
© Phins.com. No portion of this site may be reproduced without
the express permission of the author, Curt Fennell. All rights reserved.