Re: WR corps...we have what we invested in.
Date: November 21, 2012 10:00AM
realist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget that GM's regularly redo deals to
> create CAP space, and more contracts have signing
> bonuses that kick in later...so while you can
> average out a deal in theory...the actual CAP hit
> in each year is different.
>
> You may have a different set of priorities ...but
> money is not really the limiting factor.
>
> If we sign Wallace we still have to all our picks
> who will get paid according to draft position not
> player position. So if it is Wallace and a 1st
> round WR that means we invest less in another area
> of need.
>
> I personally do not wish to watch Tannehill
> struggle to find open WR's because teams double
> team Wallace and no-one else has the speed to
> stretch the field.
>
> Ireland will double down on WR. 1 FA plus 1 draft
> pick or 2 of each.
>
> And he has the books open...so I am sure he will
> find the money to make it work.
When I read this I thought to myself, "But who is to say that Ireland will even see that Wide receiver is the number one crucial problem even though we have a quarterback who desperately needs that help?"
Then I said to myself, "Oh, come the hell on, Bob, EVEN IRELAND could not be that blind."
Well, why did I post this then?
For some reason, I just want it on record around in April after the draft.