Would you trade #12 to SF for #31 and #34 plus a 4th this year, or 3rd next?

Niners have 2nd pick in round 2 could move up

if there isn't a bonified star at 12 We could load up with 31, 34, 42, 54 77 & 82 in the first 3 rounds

Take a WR, 2 CB, OL, DE, RB



Current picks


1st round — 12th overall
2nd round — 42nd
2nd round — 54th (from Colts for the trade of cornerback Vontae Davis)
3rd round — 77th
3rd round — 82nd (from Bears for the trade of receiver Brandon Marshall)
4th round — 110th
5th round — 146th
5th round — 166th (compensatory)
7th round — 217th
7th round — 224th (from Dallas for the trade of center Ryan Cook)
7th round — 250th (compensatory)

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Would you trade #12 to SF for #31 and #34 plus a
> 4th this year, or 3rd next?


That is not a bad deal, but I want Quality over quantity this year.. I would rather trade up then trade back...

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> THE Truth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Would you trade #12 to SF for #31 and #34 plus
> a
> > 4th this year, or 3rd next?
>
>
> That is not a bad deal, but I want Quality over
> quantity this year.. I would rather trade up then
> trade back...


I don't think this is the draft for quality over quantity. Just not a lot of blue chippers at the top.

Could be that Austin is the hot prospect everyone wants in the mid teens.


Could be a good deal.

There's a whole bunch of DT's, DE's, CB's, S, WR's that will be available in that range that are going to be pretty close to the level of talent of most of the guys we would consider at #12.

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Would you trade #12 to SF for #31 and #34 plus a
> 4th this year, or 3rd next?


I'd do the deal. I can't think of anyone I'd really really want to take at 12 who realisticly would be there

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think this is the draft for quality over
> quantity. Just not a lot of blue chippers at the
> top.
>
> Could be that Austin is the hot prospect everyone
> wants in the mid teens.
>
>
> Could be a good deal.
>
> There's a whole bunch of DT's, DE's, CB's, S, WR's
> that will be available in that range that are
> going to be pretty close to the level of talent of
> most of the guys we would consider at #12.


If we can get Lane Johnson or Chance Warmack by staying put or trading up a couple picks with one of our thirds. I would much rather do that then, trade back and take a 2nd or third tier linemen or pass rusher...

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

there's a good chance one of the 2 top OGs will be there at 12, or L Johnson, if that's your thing.

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

I just want to make sure we have a LT this year... If Ireland has a rabbit he can pull out of his hat to solidify the oline I am all for it..
If that is the case I would personally take Patterson at 12, even Eifert possibly.. I think Austin is to small to be a dependable choice at 12...
Warmack is special, many people have him rated as the top guy.. If he is going to be a probowl guard next to Pouncey with Incognito on the other side, that would be the best interior in football. Opposing LB's and safeties would be pigeon holed into making sure they protect the middle of the field on play action all day... They would almost always have to bite..
We have some receivers now, so if the line is solid, RT has no excuses for not being what so many believe him to be.. I want to see that...
I am basing this analysis on the probability we sign Grimes to solidify the CB position predraft...

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> THE Truth Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I don't think this is the draft for quality
> over
> > quantity. Just not a lot of blue chippers at
> the
> > top.
> >
> > Could be that Austin is the hot prospect
> everyone
> > wants in the mid teens.
> >
> >
> > Could be a good deal.
> >
> > There's a whole bunch of DT's, DE's, CB's, S,
> WR's
> > that will be available in that range that are
> > going to be pretty close to the level of talent
> of
> > most of the guys we would consider at #12.
>
>
> If we can get Lane Johnson or Chance Warmack by
> staying put or trading up a couple picks with one
> of our thirds. I would much rather do that then,
> trade back and take a 2nd or third tier linemen or
> pass rusher...


Warmack worries me.

I think he has the potential to get too big for our blocking scheme. I think Cooper is a better fit for us after watching his film.

But I agree crowder. If Johnson is there you run to the podium.

If he's not it looks like it could boil down to taking Austin, an OG, or auctioning off Austin to the highest bidder.

Crowder52 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just want to make sure we have a LT this year...


We already do. Johnathan Martin.

If the top 3 OT's are off the board at #8 we won't have a problem finding a RT in the 2nd or 3rd. Plenty of guys in this draft that fit that bill.

THE Truth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> We already do. Johnathan Martin.
>
> If the top 3 OT's are off the board at #8 we won't
> have a problem finding a RT in the 2nd or 3rd.
> Plenty of guys in this draft that fit that bill.


If Jonathan Martin puts on 20 pounds of muscle then I agree..
I do agree that we could get a decent RT in the 2nd or 3rd...
It does concern me that if Martin does not get stronger and he is our best tackle on the roster.....

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
Nietzsche

if we moved up that high we'd take millner
sorry but I don't see trading up (esp 2 draft picks) to take yet another OL in the first round. not happening.

________________________________________________________
The beatings will continue until morale improves.

Sorry but it's on the internet so it has to be true.

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers