Last REAL play of the Colts game
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
They play it safe and give it to this Ballard? And after all the times we tried to sack Luck by his waist, we try to tackle this guy by trying to wrap him up around his shoulders.
Okay, coaches I get it.
You teach players to tackle the quarterbacks low and tackle the runners high???????????
I didn't see anybody try to tackle that guy, they were trying to pull the ball out. We could have gotten at least one more chance if they had managed to stop him, but they didn't really even try.
Anybody watching the Giant game, just then a sack of Eli HIGH that prevented a completion. You don't worry about a quarterback's LEGS, you worry about his arm.
I didn't see much pressure on Luck all day. If the hurries, knock downs, and sacks are reversed, I think the results would have been much different. Not taking anything away from luck but he had a lot of time in the pocket. Tannehill, on the other hand, was harassed a LOT!
GBOFinFan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I didn't see much pressure on Luck all day. If the
> hurries, knock downs, and sacks are reversed, I
> think the results would have been much different.
> Not taking anything away from luck but he had a
> lot of time in the pocket. Tannehill, on the other
> hand, was harassed a LOT!
It's ridiculous that after all of these years and draft picks, the o-line is still a concern!