Poll

11 votes were received.
All visitors can vote.

Should we take Stanzi

	at 15
	Lower rounds
	Not at all

---

From Mel Kiper it seems that Stanzi is the only quarterback with positives in every area, accuracy, velocity of passes, mobility, brains, pocket presence and ability to think and make good decisions on the run. Now this is NOT to say that Mel said he was the best in all those categories but that he, unlike all of the other quarterbacks, Newton, Locker, Mallett, Gabbert, had no appreciable deficiency in any category.

So should we take him at 15, lower rounds, or not at all.

I like him at lower rounds, if we cannot get Mallett at 15.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

In what I've seen, he still looks slow and not very accurate. He also didn't have to deal with a lot of pressure playing behind a big O-Line. I think Stanzi will be a bust where-ever he's taken.

Don't sound wierd. Sounds like you think we REALLY need a quarterback.

Phinsfan2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is going to sound weird to some but I don't
> take Stanzi, or any other QB for that matter,
> UNLESS I have already taken a QB in the 1st round
> as well.


its not weird, its bignasty-esq

IF we were to go with quarterback this year (your plan not mine), I agree completely with taking a flyer in the late rounds on a project QB also, of course, unless I misread you and you were being sarcastic.

So do you agree that if we go for QB, we pick one high one and one low one ALSO?

I think that way. (that is assuming we consider QB a high enough priority to get one in the first round.) It makes more sense to make sure.

woah---based on this poll it is plausible that the phins would draft this guy in the 1st round? He's a 4th rounder at best from all accounts.

maybe 3-5