Home
THIS SITE
  About Phins.com
  Contact Us
TEAM NEWS
  Team Info
  Twitter Feeds
  News Wire
  Phins RSS Feed
GAMES
  Schedule
PERSONNEL
  Roster
  Depth Chart
FOR THE FANS
  Forums
  Places To Watch
HISTORY
  Team History
  1972 Tribute
 
-- Advertisement --
Privacy Policy at Phins.com
 
  Phins.com Phorums
    News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links  
          Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :  Phins.com Phorums The fastest message board... ever.
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel
Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: ChambersDeepBall ()
Date: November 19, 2010 04:17AM

Would have provided depth at center

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: Aqua&Orange ()
Date: November 19, 2010 04:22AM

Shoulda, coulda, woulda, the bottom line is, we suck at this point.

---------------------

"When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: JC ()
Date: November 19, 2010 05:25AM

In hindsight, maybe.

But consider this...were more than halfway through the season and guess what? NO OTHER TEAM has picked up Grove. NOBODY.

That means one of two things: he and his agent are in denial about his worth and he's demanding a lot of money. Or, his body is currently STILL fragile, even after resting for many weeks.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: Welead ()
Date: November 19, 2010 07:00AM

Roth, Camarillo, Taylor, Porter (over Crowder), and now apparently Grove. This front office is horrible!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: dolfan1 ()
Date: November 19, 2010 07:01PM

The front office will be gone after this year

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: BigNastyFish ()
Date: November 20, 2010 07:57AM

He's trash -- that's why he's STILL a FA.

He was a BAD decision from the start = INJURY HISTORY (which these monkies can't seem to understand with linemen in general.

Long - Surgery in college
Odrick - Surgery in college

Both with reoccurance in the Pro's

Grove - was out like 50% of the time in Oakland.

The irony is the huge deal Parcells made about injury prone players and dudes with a history of missing games...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Probably should have held on to Jake Grove
Posted by: ghotirule ()
Date: November 20, 2010 08:13AM


Options: ReplyQuote


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
Home Curt Fennell
Contact Us
DOLFAN in New England
TOP
   
© Phins.com. No portion of this site may be reproduced without
the express permission of the author, Curt Fennell. All rights reserved.