Phinsfan2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Injuries may have kept him from being the player
> he could have been but he's not hurt right now.
> He was healthy enough to go work out for the Pats
> and to be surprised that he was cut by us.
>
RESPONSE: We are talking about his injury history, not how he feels right now.
EVERY running play must involve the middle
> > linebacker?
>
> Of course not, and you know it. But the notion
> that he was so good teams ran away from him is
> absurd
and not just because he wasn't good enough
> to force teams to take that approach, but that the
> idea that approach is even possible is lunacy
> because he's A MIDDLE LINEBACKER.
>
RESPONSE: I never said that good teams ran away from him and the point was that not EVERY running play involves him therefore when you consider his tackles, you have to go back and percentage the plays that were run at him.
PF2, you are so quick to throw nuclear bombs when you don't understand the fine gradations of the issue.
> You can't run away from a MLB unless you run
> backwards.
RESPONSE: And when you run an end-around are you running backwards?
> I never said he sucked. I said at his peak he was
> above average at the one thing that was his
> strength as a player. Beyond that he was "sub
> par".
>
> To me that means he's a backup on a good team.
> there's no shame in that.
RESPONSE: Now you've gotten confused again. You've left the house from the front door, wandered around, got confused, re-entered the house from the back door and you think you're in a different house.
If you look back, my post did not single you or your position out. Have you forgotten that YOU TOOK ON MY POST? There were a lot of positions on this thread that said Crowder sucked. What kind of ego do you have that when I rebut that position, you jump up like a dog in a pack of dogs that got hit with a rock some kid threw out at the pack?