KUDO'S To Our very Own columnist , Chris Shashaty:
start && end > -1) {
if (start > -1) {
var res = data.substring(start, end);
start = res.indexOf('>') + 1;
res = res.substring(start);
if (res.length != 0) {
eval(res);
}
}
cursor = end + 1;
}
}
}
//]]>
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Hooligan2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The WC worked very well on occasion last season
> with Ricky running the ball, especially in the
> game when Pennington and Henne went down and
> before Thigpen came in. When used properly in a
> "surprise" situation it still has merit.
Kinda hard to surprise anyone when your runningback lines up as the QB and your QB is on the sidelines or lined up as a blocker/reciever.
TreasurecoastPhinsfan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hooligan2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The WC worked very well on occasion last season
> > with Ricky running the ball, especially in the
> > game when Pennington and Henne went down and
> > before Thigpen came in. When used properly in a
> > "surprise" situation it still has merit.
>
>
>
>
> Kinda hard to surprise anyone when your
> runningback lines up as the QB and your QB is on
> the sidelines or lined up as a blocker/reciever.
I still say if you're able to switch to it quickly (by not changing personnel) it can work better. The defense will either call a time out or be forced to play it without optimal personnel. But, if your QB/WR is always a decoy and the RB/QB can't throw the ball, then what's the point?
I guess Ronnie Could throw the ball , but 90% of his wildcat was him making a quick cut from the snap. But your right it would be much moreeffective without taking the QB out. But Henne f**king telegraphs everything anyways.
cshashaty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Always fun to stir up a beehive!
>
> Here's a question: Are the Dolphins waiting for
> their QB of the future to fall into their lap the
> way Marino did in 1983?
cshashaty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Always fun to stir up a beehive!
>
> Here's a question: Are the Dolphins waiting for
> their QB of the future to fall into their lap the
> way Marino did in 1983?
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
If Henne fails, and Ireland refuses to move up and get Luck, Barkley, or Jones, then I will believe he has major issues with building a franchise. We all know that this is a QB driven league these days. Unlike days of past, a QB is by far the most important position on the field.
If Henne fails, he better do whatever it takes to get one of them. If he doesnt, I will give up on him and the Dolphins philosiphy of winning.
I have said over and over, I believe Blaine Gabbert was the only QB who would be a legitimate upgrade over Henne...if we couldnt get him, then why waste another pick on a different QB?
The safe pick this year was Mike Pouncey, the safe pick next year is Luck, Barkley, or Jones...who I believe all 3 will be franchise QB's.
I think the best point of the article was we didn't get anyone to stretch the field. That scrub receiver out of that christian school ain't shit. If he were, he wouldn't be at that scrub college. D's will be able to zone us all day long. We have no homerun threat at RB. The kid from Kstate will be lucky to get over 4 ypg.
I actually think Henne can be a good QB, but with our playcalling all teams have to do is play zone and let Danny C miss FG's
ChambersDeepBall Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think the best point of the article was we
> didn't get anyone to stretch the field. That
> scrub receiver out of that christian school ain't
> shit. If he were, he wouldn't be at that scrub
> college.
This is one of the most ridiculous things I've read around here. You're saying no player from a small school has ever had success in the NFL?
cshashaty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Always fun to stir up a beehive!
>
> Here's a question: Are the Dolphins waiting for
> their QB of the future to fall into their lap the
> way Marino did in 1983?
Hi Chris,
Maybe so, but I think they should have at least taken a mid to late round QB in this draft. Although I do understand the "if you're going to draft a QB, do it in the first round" argument also.
Putting all our eggs in the acquire-a-veteran basket is kind of risky. IMO they should have picked up a QB in this draft, and ALSO get a veteran in the mix. That would leave us with Henne, Thiggy, Draftee, and Veteran in camp. One guy gets cut or dealt, the rest fight it out for pecking order. That would have been the most sensible strategy, I think.
berkeley223 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ChambersDeepBall Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think the best point of the article was we
> > didn't get anyone to stretch the field. That
> > scrub receiver out of that christian school
> ain't
> > shit. If he were, he wouldn't be at that scrub
> > college.
>
> This is one of the most ridiculous things I've
> read around here. You're saying no player from a
> small school has ever had success in the NFL?
Agreed, Mark Duper came from a small school, you never know where our next gem of a receiver might come from.
Plus, in an interview I heard with the coach of Gates' school, the coach said that Gates has a cousin who went to the same school and currently is in the NFL (Forgot his name), so there's an example of Abilene Christian producing an NFL player right there.
Phinsfan2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ChyrenB Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yeah, but first, I am just trying to jab PF2
> and
> > point out how inappropriate his logic is.
>
> My logic is just fine, thank you very much. At
> least it is until you twist it into a pretzel with
> some wild-ass assumption.