Home
THIS SITE
  About Phins.com
  Contact Us
TEAM NEWS
  Team Info
  Twitter Feeds
  News Wire
  Phins RSS Feed
GAMES
  Schedule
PERSONNEL
  Roster
  Depth Chart
FOR THE FANS
  Forums
  Places To Watch
HISTORY
  Team History
  1972 Tribute
 
-- Advertisement --
Privacy Policy at Phins.com
 
  Phins.com Phorums
    News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links  
          Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :  Phins.com Phorums The fastest message board... ever.
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel
Pages: Previous1234Next
Current Page: 3 of 4
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: Finshady ()
Date: January 05, 2014 02:20PM

their were some that thought Griffin was better. I say who however the point I make is you never really know until they play in the league.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: dolphin ()
Date: January 06, 2014 08:52AM

We make the playoffs is Luck is our QB, same play calling and everything.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Date: January 06, 2014 09:01AM

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We make the playoffs is Luck is our QB, same play
> calling and everything.


Yeah exactly the same. eye rolling smiley

Shhhhhhhhhh. Just let him believe it and maybe he will go away.........

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: eesti ()
Date: January 06, 2014 09:06AM

Luck sure lived up to his name in the playoff win.

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: samsam3738 ()
Date: January 06, 2014 09:51AM

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We make the playoffs is Luck is our QB, same play
> calling and everything.


Disagreed 100 percent.

Not with our sweeze cheese OL.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 06, 2014 10:52AM

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolphin Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We make the playoffs is Luck is our QB, same
> play
> > calling and everything.
>
>
> Disagreed 100 percent.
>
> Not with our sweeze cheese OL.

Not he's right. BECAUSE Luck is the best POCKET quarterback in his class.

Tanny is not a pocket quarterback.

Tanny has the POTENTIAL to be the SECOND BEST QUARTERBACK IN THAT CLASS, after Luck, but only if his skill set is properly utilized and that IS NOT passing from the pocket.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: Sickofit+1 ()
Date: January 06, 2014 10:59AM

I will go on to be the first to say Tanny should go on to put up better numbers than the rest of his draft class, if we can get a good OC.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 06, 2014 11:37AM

If that OC does the same thing as Sherman and has him playing in the pocket, the RESULTS WILL BE NO DIFFERENT.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: samsam3738 ()
Date: January 06, 2014 11:42AM

sorry but it doesnt matter if luck is the best pocket qb in football...if the rush is on his face 99.9 percent of the time like it was on tannehill...............then luck aint making the playoffs with this phins team.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 06, 2014 11:44AM

You're right but that wasn't happening in the Jets game to Tannehill.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: samsam3738 ()
Date: January 06, 2014 11:49AM

ChyrenB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're right but that wasn't happening in the Jets
> game to Tannehill.


Hartline injured and the other signee from the rams injured and the other signee Tend injured and a sweeze cheese Oline...

Add all that together and luck aint making a thing happen playing along side this phins mess.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 06, 2014 11:56AM

Still no sacks. How do you explain that?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 06, 2014 12:34PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Date: January 06, 2014 12:39PM

It doesn't matter who the best is. DAN MARINO IS RINGLESS. I just want a decent QB. Check. Now lets get an OC who doesn't throw long balls on 4th and 1. That's is all. Especially with one of the most mobile QB's in the NFL. drinking smiley

GO DOLPHINS!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: Finshady ()
Date: January 06, 2014 02:17PM

The offensive coordinator is a good start, but how about a QB's coach that can teach Tanne how to be a better pro. How refreshing an idea really.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: Hooligan2 ()
Date: January 06, 2014 02:26PM

Not necessary. Philbin scotch taped a motivational poster on Tanny's locker.

........................................

The Clown Show Continues



-

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: JC ()
Date: January 07, 2014 04:52AM

If Luck whoops Tom Baby's butt this weekend I will become a believer in him.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: dolphin ()
Date: January 07, 2014 09:22AM

samsam in total denial about Tannehill.

I guess a new OC will magically make his inability to hit deep passes go away.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: samsam3738 ()
Date: January 07, 2014 09:54AM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 07, 2014 10:16AM

You make good points, SamSam. No matter what happens. We'll see. One thing is for sure, Tannehill will be back and starting next year.

With Hundley dropping out, that only leaves Manziel and Bridgewater and thus if at all, we will only get a QB in the later rounds.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: KB ()
Date: January 07, 2014 10:50AM

samsam3738 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dolphin id like to see how well tannehill does
> with a great OLINE.
>
>
> Oh i forgot and healthy receivers.
>
>
> OOPS one more......and a running game so that the
> opposing defense cant concentrate on the pass.
>
>
> We had one of the worst Running games of all
> football as well.

Lol..well h3ll yea, give Tim Tebow a 'great' O-line, receivers, running game and a shut down defense and he can be successful too. But only for a year...maybe two. A team like that is nearly impossible to build and impossible to keep together in this era of free agency.

The ABSOLUTE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT for year after year successful NFL team today is a 'great' QB. Players have come and gone, the Patriots are still successful with the lady, Marino never got a ring but while he was here our team was almost always successful. By successful I mean a contender, competitive, relevant.

You can keep dreaming of re-building the 72 team, or the '85 bears or the early 90's Giants, it AIN'T gonna happen. We need a 'great' QB to return to relevance AS A FRANCHISE (we are after all DOLPHIN fans, not Feely, Henne, or Tannehill fans). If Tannehill is one he hasn't showed it in two unchallenged, un-injured years of starting (and those last two games were the PERFECT chance for him to do so).



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/07/2014 10:53AM by KB.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: captkoi ()
Date: January 07, 2014 11:38AM

KB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> samsam3738 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > dolphin id like to see how well tannehill does
> > with a great OLINE.
> >
> >
> > Oh i forgot and healthy receivers.
> >
> >
> > OOPS one more......and a running game so that
> the
> > opposing defense cant concentrate on the pass.
> >
> >
> > We had one of the worst Running games of all
> > football as well.
>
> Lol..well h3ll yea, give Tim Tebow a 'great'
> O-line, receivers, running game and a shut down
> defense and he can be successful too. But only
> for a year...maybe two. A team like that is
> nearly impossible to build and impossible to keep
> together in this era of free agency.
>
> The ABSOLUTE MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT for year after
> year successful NFL team today is a 'great' QB.
> Players have come and gone, the Patriots are still
> successful with the lady, Marino never got a ring
> but while he was here our team was almost always
> successful. By successful I mean a contender,
> competitive, relevant.
>
> You can keep dreaming of re-building the 72 team,
> or the '85 bears or the early 90's Giants, it
> AIN'T gonna happen. We need a 'great' QB to
> return to relevance AS A FRANCHISE (we are after
> all DOLPHIN fans, not Feely, Henne, or Tannehill
> fans). If Tannehill is one he hasn't showed it in
> two unchallenged, un-injured years of starting
> (and those last two games were the PERFECT chance
> for him to do so).

************************************************

True, every team would like to have a "great" QB, but there are very few of them right now. I can name four "great" ones that are in the league at present time, but that's it. I don't see any coming in this year's draft, nor next year's (so far).

RT is a good QB who will get better. But, although you make light of it, KB, RT and every other QB in the league needs a good OL to be able to do anything in this league. RT hasn't had a good OL since he's been in Miami, and he has done very well (stat-wise).

That's what Sam and others are saying...give him a decent OL that can protect him, and he will do a much better job.

Go ahead, KB, get rid of RT; then what are you going to do?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: samsam3738 ()
Date: January 07, 2014 01:53PM

KB IMO tebow isjust not in the same level as Tannehill.


Tebow was a good college QB because of the wildkat. But his style of play will not work in the NFL.


He is a terrible passer.

I saw some footage of him on tv missing wide open receivers. No dbs.


He is whatever his fans want in to be...in a wonderland.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: Finshady ()
Date: January 08, 2014 03:15AM

Riddle me this Tanne is a good runner with the football. However he did not run as much as he could, and their fore took too many sacks, and in completions. Why not allow him to improvise, and be more spontaneous on the field instead of a robot. He played like he had no passion for the game, and that was very troubling. I say bring another QB, and may the best man win. How about Josh McCown did damn good with the Bears.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: eesti ()
Date: January 08, 2014 03:35AM

BS

.....................................................................................
“I'm here" You're welcome!" - Kenny Powers

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: ChyrenB ()
Date: January 08, 2014 10:08AM

And Finshady, when he was improvising those few times, like you said, you could see on his face a changed man. You could see confidence on his face. Not the scared puppy you see in the pocket.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: dolphin ()
Date: January 09, 2014 05:47AM

You can either throw the deep ball or you can't he can't. couldnt do it last year, couldnt this year.

The reason he didnt run was cause sherman told him not to, which was stupid.

The last 2 games he went back to not running. IF he would have ran the read option against the bills he would have destoryed them.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: dolphin ()
Date: January 09, 2014 05:48AM

captoki just curious, but who are the 4 great ones you see

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: dolphaholic ()
Date: January 09, 2014 07:51AM

Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Manning?.........duh

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Their has been much debate about keeping Tannehill
Posted by: captkoi ()
Date: January 09, 2014 09:05AM

dolphin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> captoki just curious, but who are the 4 great ones
> you see

**************************************

See Holic's post.

Options: ReplyQuote
Pages: Previous1234Next
Current Page: 3 of 4


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
Home Curt Fennell
Contact Us
DOLFAN in New England
TOP
   
© Phins.com. No portion of this site may be reproduced without
the express permission of the author, Curt Fennell. All rights reserved.