 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| -- Advertisement -- |
 |
Phins.com Phorums |  | ||||||||
 |
News Wire | Roster | Depth Chart | Last/Next Game | Schedule | Links |  |
||||||||
|
Miami Dolphins Civilized Discussion :
Phins.com Phorums
This is a moderated phorum for the CIVILIZED discussion of the Miami Dolphins. In this phorum, there are rules and moderators to make sure you abide by the rules. The moderators for this phorum are JC and Colonel.
Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
montequi
()
Date: October 11, 2011 08:32AM You just can't sit luck for 3-4 years. Luck brings the hype of Tebow (which puts butts in the seats) and the poise of P Manning coming out of college. Rodgers was a dark-horse, and he had notable flaws coming out of college (which he obviously worked on in those years he played behind Favre), but Luck is a completely different commodity. It wouldn't make sense for a team to draft him and bench him for 3-4 years. I think Indy has to take a hard look at Peyton's health. Does he really have 3-4 years left in him? Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: October 11, 2011 11:59AM Peyton argues that he has atleast 5. I heard him say it. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
TreasurecoastPhinsfan
()
Date: October 11, 2011 12:05PM Aqua&Orange Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Peyton argues that he has atleast 5. I heard him > say it. As long as his new 90$ Million contract anyway...........  Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
Ken
()
Date: October 11, 2011 12:22PM IF the Colts draft Luck...they let Manning walk. They won't keep them both on their roster.
They have to make a choice, and soon. New guy going forward or Manning for now. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
Aqua&Orange
()
Date: October 11, 2011 12:30PM John Clayton says that he doesnt think the Colts would draft Luck if they have the #1 pick. --------------------- "When you suck long enough, you get a Hickey" Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
(R/J)ay
()
Date: October 11, 2011 01:05PM Ken Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > IF the Colts draft Luck...they let Manning walk. > They won't keep them both on their roster. > > They have to make a choice, and soon. New guy > going forward or Manning for now. They can and they will. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
808phan
()
Date: October 11, 2011 06:17PM (R/J)ay Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > but Irsay also seems to think Luck is too big a talent to pass up. “Even if that means that guy sits for three or four years, you’d certainly think about >taking him,” Irsay said. “You see what Green Bay did with Favre and Rodgers and you’d like to be able to do the same thing.” Blowing a 17 point lead and making comments like that - proof right there that the Colts are tanking it. At least Ross is keeping his mouth shut about Luck. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
dolphaholic
()
Date: October 12, 2011 05:38AM I always love these conspiracy theories, how exactly did the Colts "tank" it? Did the coach pull starters and put in 2nd/3rd stringers?........were the players told to lay down or did they take it upon themselves to?.....were the refs in on this conspiracy, or for that matter the NFL? I'm curious for specifics on how they "tanked" it. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
montequi
()
Date: October 12, 2011 06:48AM dolphaholic Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I always love these conspiracy theories, how > exactly did the Colts "tank" it? Did the coach > pull starters and put in 2nd/3rd > stringers?........were the players told to lay > down or did they take it upon themselves > to?.....were the refs in on this conspiracy, or > for that matter the NFL? I'm curious for specifics > on how they "tanked" it. They tanked it when they named Painter the starting QB. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
Ken
()
Date: October 13, 2011 03:55AM (R/J)ay Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Ken Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > IF the Colts draft Luck...they let Manning > walk. > > They won't keep them both on their roster. > > > > They have to make a choice, and soon. New guy > > going forward or Manning for now. > > > They can and they will. RE: I can't see the Colts tying up 90 mil on Manning and then having to Tie up another 50 mil to Luck for the priveledge of having him sit on the bench. I'm not saying that they won't do it...but it does not make sense for them to do it. 140 mil on two players over four years is a quite sizable portion of the salary cap for two players at the same position. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
(R/J)ay
()
Date: October 13, 2011 05:24AM Cam Newton was the #1 pick this offseason and got $22 million over 4 years.
The Rams or Colts will jump on him in a heartbeat. Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
dolphaholic
()
Date: October 13, 2011 06:13AM montequi Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > dolphaholic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I always love these conspiracy theories, how > > exactly did the Colts "tank" it? Did the coach > > pull starters and put in 2nd/3rd > > stringers?........were the players told to lay > > down or did they take it upon themselves > > to?.....were the refs in on this conspiracy, or > > for that matter the NFL? I'm curious for > specifics > > on how they "tanked" it. > > They tanked it when they named Painter the > starting QB. I don't know about that, the team seems to be playing better with Painter then Collins Re: Jim Irsay on Andrew Luck
Posted by:
montequi
()
Date: October 13, 2011 07:25AM They still blew a big lead to KC. Of course, we blew a lead to Cleveland. It's going to be a tough fight for the bottom of the league! Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
